Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9462: Edimax EW-7438RPn formWpsProxyEnable stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was detected in Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.31. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formWpsProxyEnable of the file /goform/formWpsProxyEnable. The manipulation of the argument submit-url results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take critical

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-9462 is a critical flaw in Edimax EW-7438RPn firmware 1.31. A remote attacker with required access could trigger a stack-based buffer overflow in a WPS proxy form handler, potentially taking control of the device. Public exploit material exists, but the provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any deployed EW-7438RPn 1.31 device, particularly if remotely administered. Public exploit availability and complete impact justify rapid exposure reduction even though active exploitation is not confirmed in the provided evidence.

Technical view

The issue affects /goform/formWpsProxyEnable in Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.31. Manipulating the submit-url argument can cause a stack-based buffer overflow, mapped to CWE-119 and CWE-121. The CVSS v2 score is 9.0 with network attack vector, low complexity, single authentication, and complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Edimax EW-7438RPn devices running firmware 1.31, especially where the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks. The CVSS vector indicates authentication is required, but the attack is remote once that access condition is met.

Exploitation context

VulDB states exploit material is public and may be used. The source bundle does not include KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation in the wild. Vendor contact reportedly received no response, and no official patch or workaround is named in the provided sources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is mainly from VulDB and the CVE source bundle. Vendor response and remediation status are unclear. Do not assume other Edimax models or firmware versions are affected unless separately confirmed. The CVSS vector shows authenticated remote attack conditions despite the description saying remote launch.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize Edimax EW-7438RPn devices running firmware 1.31.
  • Restrict management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Disable unnecessary remote administration exposure where operationally possible.
  • Check Edimax guidance regularly for firmware updates or official mitigations.
  • Increase monitoring for suspicious access to the affected WPS proxy endpoint.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm device model and firmware version from asset inventory or administration UI.
  • Verify whether the management interface is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks.
  • Review logs for unusual requests involving /goform/formWpsProxyEnable or submit-url.
  • Compare network detections with VulDB CTI indicators where available.
  • Document whether authentication controls are enforced for the affected interface.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9462 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
1 ADP providers
5 Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADP CISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
9 CVSS 2.0 Critical AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 8 10 VulDB
8.8 CVSS 3.1 High CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 2.8 5.9 VulDB
8.8 CVSS 3.0 High CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 2.8 5.9 VulDB
8.7 CVSS 4.0 High CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7 High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9462 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADP CISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.31 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.