Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9389: Tenda F456 L7Im frmL7ImForm buffer overflow

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda F456 1.0.0.5. This affects the function frmL7ImForm of the file /goform/L7Im. The manipulation of the argument page leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take critical

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-9389 is a critical buffer overflow in Tenda F456 firmware 1.0.0.5. A remote attacker with required authentication may be able to compromise the router’s confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Public exploit material is reported, but the provided sources do not confirm active exploitation or a vendor patch.

Executive priority

Prioritize identification and containment within router inventories. This is critical because compromise of an edge router can affect traffic control, availability, and downstream trust. Urgency is high, but evidence does not support claiming active exploitation from the supplied sources.

Technical view

The vulnerability affects frmL7ImForm in /goform/L7Im. Manipulation of the page argument can cause a buffer overflow, mapped to CWE-119 and CWE-120. The CVSS 2.0 vector is network-accessible, low complexity, authenticated, with complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Tenda F456 devices running firmware 1.0.0.5. Risk is highest where router administration is reachable from untrusted networks. The CVSS vector indicates authentication is required, so weak, shared, or compromised admin credentials increase practical exposure.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploit information has been publicly disclosed and may be used. CISA KEV is false, and no cited source confirms exploitation in the wild. Treat public proof-of-concept availability as a strong urgency signal, not evidence of active compromise.

Researcher notes

The record identifies the vulnerable function, endpoint, parameter, affected firmware, and CWE classes, but does not provide a confirmed fixed version, vendor advisory details, or validated IoCs. Avoid expanding scope beyond Tenda F456 1.0.0.5 unless later vendor or CVE updates support it.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Tenda F456 devices and confirm firmware version 1.0.0.5.
  • Restrict router administration to trusted management networks only.
  • Remove any internet exposure of the management interface.
  • Check Tenda guidance for firmware updates, advisories, or replacement direction.
  • Review logs for suspicious access involving /goform/L7Im.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any deployed device is Tenda F456 firmware 1.0.0.5.
  • Verify management access is blocked from untrusted networks.
  • Check whether default or weak administrator credentials remain in use.
  • Monitor administrative access logs for unexpected source addresses.
  • Track vendor and CVE records for patch or mitigation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9389 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
1 ADP providers
6 Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADP CISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
9 CVSS 2.0 Critical AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 8 10 VulDB
8.8 CVSS 3.1 High CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 2.8 5.9 VulDB
8.8 CVSS 3.0 High CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 2.8 5.9 VulDB
8.7 CVSS 4.0 High CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7 High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9389 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADP CISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
Tenda F456 1.0.0.5 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.