Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9384: Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setDiagnosisCfg os command injection

A vulnerability was found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This vulnerability affects the function setDiagnosisCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argument ip results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take critical

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Totolink A8000RU router firmware issue lets a remote attacker run operating-system commands through the web management interface. For organizations still using this model and firmware, the risk is severe because compromise of a router can expose traffic, credentials, internal networks, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any exposed or business-critical A8000RU router. Prioritize inventory and isolation first, then vendor remediation or replacement. The business risk is high because successful router compromise can undermine network trust and availability.

Technical view

CVE-2026-9384 affects Totolink A8000RU firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The setDiagnosisCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi mishandles the ip argument, causing OS command injection. CVSS v2 is 10.0: network reachable, low complexity, no authentication, complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Sources map it to CWE-77 and CWE-78.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Totolink A8000RU web management is reachable from untrusted networks, especially internet-facing administration. The source bundle names only firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521, so do not assume other models or versions are affected without vendor evidence.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploit material has been made public and could be used. It does not provide KEV confirmation or another cited source proving active exploitation in the wild, so active exploitation should not be claimed from this evidence alone.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a remotely reachable OS command injection in the Web Management Interface, specifically setDiagnosisCfg and the ip argument. Public PoC availability is cited, but KEV is false and fix status is not named. Avoid expanding affected scope beyond the stated firmware without additional vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Totolink A8000RU devices and firmware versions in use.
  • Remove web management access from the internet and untrusted networks.
  • Check Totolink guidance for firmware updates, advisories, or replacement direction.
  • Restrict administration to trusted management networks and authenticated VPN paths.
  • Replace unsupported exposed devices if no vendor fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any A8000RU runs firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521.
  • Check external attack surface records for exposed web management interfaces.
  • Review firewall rules for administrative access to the router interface.
  • Inspect device logs and network telemetry for unusual management activity.
  • Track CVE, VulDB, and Totolink pages for fix status changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9384 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
0 ADP providers
6 Source links

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
10 CVSS 2.0 Critical AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 10 10 VulDB
9.8 CVSS 3.1 Critical CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 3.9 5.9 VulDB
9.8 CVSS 3.0 Critical CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 3.9 5.9 VulDB
9.3 CVSS 4.0 Critical CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3 Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9384 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

CWE mapping pending import

This CVE carries a CWE mapping that will resolve to a full Glexia CWE intelligence page after the official CWE import is complete.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.