LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9202: Unauthenticated User Registration Could Lead to Remote Code Execution

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to create unlimited user accounts on any Langflow instance; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true (documented deployment option), newly created accounts are immediately active and can authenticate to reach RCE endpoints, bypassing the need for AUTO_LOGIN.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

IBM Langflow OSS has a critical issue where outsiders may create unlimited accounts without authentication. If deployments automatically activate new users, those accounts can reach functionality described as leading to remote code execution. Public-facing Langflow systems should be reviewed urgently.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any exposed Langflow deployment. The business risk is potential full system compromise, but urgency depends on whether affected versions are deployed and whether automatic activation is enabled.

Technical view

CVE-2026-9202 affects IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0. It is categorized as CWE-306 with CVSS 9.8. The described path is unauthenticated user registration; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true, new accounts become active and can authenticate to reach RCE endpoints.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is internet-accessible Langflow OSS running affected versions with NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true. Internal-only deployments are less exposed but still at risk from anyone with network access. Sources do not state whether all installations enable this setting by default.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. The vulnerability is network-reachable, low-complexity, requires no prior privileges, and no user interaction according to the CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and IBM advisory reference. The critical condition is unauthenticated account creation combined with immediate account activation. Confirm fixed versions and exact remediation details from IBM before closing exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Review IBM advisory and apply the vendor-provided patch or upgrade path.
  • Disable unauthenticated self-registration where possible.
  • Ensure new user accounts are not automatically active unless required.
  • Restrict Langflow access to trusted networks or authenticated gateways.
  • Audit and remove unexpected user accounts created since exposure began.
  • Rotate secrets if unauthorized access is suspected.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Langflow OSS deployments and confirm versions.
  • Check whether versions are 1.0.0 through 1.10.0.
  • Review deployment settings for NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true.
  • Confirm whether Langflow is reachable from the internet.
  • Review account creation logs for unexpected registrations.
  • Verify remediation against the IBM advisory after changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-306: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9202 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9ibm

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-9202Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
IBMLangflow OSS1.0.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-306 · source CWE mapping

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Missing Authentication for Critical Function represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.