LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9087: Keycloak: cross-session email verification proof not bound to upstream identity in first-broker-login

A flaw was found in Keycloak. The cross-session verification proof is keyed only by (local userId, idpAlias) and is not bound to the upstream identity that was actually verified, so a second upstream account on the same IdP can consume it and get linked to the victim's local account.

MediumCVSS 6.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Keycloak flaw can let one upstream identity-provider account reuse another session’s email-verification proof and link itself to a victim’s local Keycloak account. That could expose or alter the victim’s account data. Exploitation requires a logged-in attacker and user interaction, so urgency is moderate, not emergency-level.

Executive priority

Treat as a scheduled but important identity-platform update. The issue can affect account ownership and sensitive access, but available evidence does not show active exploitation and exploitation conditions are constrained.

Technical view

In first-broker-login, Keycloak stores cross-session verification proof by local userId and idpAlias, but not the verified upstream identity. A second account on the same IdP can consume that proof and link to the victim’s local account. Red Hat rates it medium, CVSS 6.4, CWE-639, with high confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 and 26.6 deployments using brokered identity login and account linking. The source bundle lists specific affected Red Hat Keycloak packages and marks 26.4.13 and 26.6.3 package entries as unaffected.

Exploitation context

No source in the bundle states active exploitation, and CISA KEV is false. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, high attack complexity, low privileges, and required user interaction. Abuse depends on identity-broker and first-login/account-linking flows.

Researcher notes

Key point is missing binding between verification proof and upstream identity. Validate only in authorized test environments by confirming whether cross-session proof consumption is tied to the exact external identity. Avoid assuming impact outside Red Hat build of Keycloak versions listed in the source bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Red Hat CVE page and linked RHSAs for official remediation guidance.
  • Update affected Red Hat build of Keycloak packages to vendor-designated unaffected releases.
  • Prioritize realms using identity brokering and first-broker-login account linking.
  • Temporarily review or restrict risky account-linking flows if vendor guidance supports it.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Red Hat build of Keycloak versions and package names in production.
  • Identify realms configured with external identity providers and first-broker-login flows.
  • Check whether installed packages match affected 26.4 or 26.6 entries.
  • Confirm remediation against Red Hat advisories RHSA-2026:25097, 25098, 30049, and 30050.
  • Review account-linking audit logs for unexpected IdP links to local users.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9087 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.25.2redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-9087Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.4.13-1affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.6.3-3affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-639 · source CWE mapping

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.