CVE-2026-9064: 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: unbounded ldap controls count in get_ldapmessage_controls_ext() causes cpu and heap amplification (remote dos)
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The get_ldapmessage_controls_ext() function in the LDAP server does not enforce an upper bound on the number of controls per LDAP message. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted LDAP request containing hundreds of thousands of minimal controls within the default maximum BER message size (2 MB), causing excessive CPU consumption and heap allocation on the server. Under concurrent exploitation, this leads to significant latency degradation, worker thread starvation, or out-of-memory termination, resulting in a denial of service.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-9064 is a denial-of-service flaw in Red Hat 389 Directory Server components. A remote unauthenticated client can send an LDAP message with an excessive number of controls, consuming CPU and memory. The business risk is directory service slowdown or outage, which can disrupt authentication-dependent applications.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority for any exposed directory service because authentication infrastructure availability can affect many business systems. Prioritize internet-facing or broadly reachable LDAP servers first.
Technical view
The flaw is in get_ldapmessage_controls_ext(), which lacks an upper bound on LDAP controls per message. Within the default 2 MB BER message size, many minimal controls can cause CPU and heap amplification. Concurrent requests may cause latency degradation, worker thread starvation, or out-of-memory termination.
Likely exposure
Organizations running affected Red Hat Directory Server, 389-ds-base, or redhat-ds packages on listed RHEL 7 ELS, 8, 9, 10, and related EUS/E4S streams are potentially exposed, especially where LDAP services are reachable from untrusted networks.
Exploitation context
The source states remote unauthenticated exploitation is possible for denial of service. KEV is false, and the provided bundle does not cite active exploitation in the wild or public exploit tooling.
Researcher notes
The core issue is unbounded control parsing in LDAP message handling, classified as CWE-770. Evidence supports availability impact only; the bundle does not indicate confidentiality or integrity compromise.
Mitigation direction
Identify affected Red Hat Directory Server and 389-ds-base deployments.
Apply the relevant Red Hat RHSA updates for the product stream.
If updates are unavailable, check Red Hat guidance for supported mitigations.
Restrict LDAP reachability to trusted networks where operationally feasible.
Monitor directory service CPU, memory, latency, and process restarts.
Validation and detection
Inventory installed 389-ds-base, redhat-ds, and Directory Server versions.
Compare deployed versions against the affected products and versions listed in the CVE bundle.
Review applicable RHSA advisories for fixed package guidance.
Check LDAP service logs for abnormal request volume or resource exhaustion symptoms.
Confirm post-update package versions match vendor advisory expectations.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-770 · source CWE mapping
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.