LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9058: Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK

For untrusted certificates that contain the "Authority Information Access - caIssuers URI" extension, Szafir SDK will automatically download the parent CA certificate from the specified URL and will import it to its trust store as a "nonqualified" certificate. In such a case, Szafir SDK returns a success status code of 0 ("Positively verified") upon successful cryptographic verification and a certificate status of "nonqualified". For other types of untrusted certificates, Szafir SDK returns a success status code of 0 ("Positively verified") upon successful cryptographic verification and a certificate status of "nondetermined". This may lead integrating applications to incorrectly treat the digital signature as valid despite an untrusted certificate chain. This flaw enables authentication bypass and user impersonation: (1) in use-cases other than qualified certificate authentication, or (2) if the qualified certificate authentication use-case is not correctly implemented by the integrating application. This issue was fixed in version 1.8.463.2.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Szafir SDK can report a digital signature as positively verified even when its certificate chain is not trusted. Applications that rely on that result without correctly checking certificate status may accept an attacker-controlled identity, enabling authentication bypass or impersonation. The issue is fixed in version 1.8.463.2.

Executive priority

Treat internet-facing or identity-sensitive Szafir integrations as an immediate remediation priority because successful abuse could impersonate users without prior access. Upgrade promptly and verify application-level trust handling. Systems not using Szafir SDK are not indicated as affected by the supplied sources.

Technical view

For untrusted certificates, Szafir SDK may return status code 0 after cryptographic verification. With a caIssuers URI, it automatically downloads and imports the parent CA certificate as nonqualified; otherwise, status may be nondetermined. Integrations that interpret code 0 alone as trust can accept signatures lacking a trusted chain.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to applications integrating Szafir SDK and making authentication or trust decisions from its verification results. Risk is highest where code 0 is accepted without enforcing the returned certificate status. The bundle does not provide a complete affected-version range; it identifies 1.8.463.2 as fixed.

Exploitation context

The flaw is remotely reachable, requires no privileges or user interaction, and may enable authentication bypass or impersonation. The supplied record is not listed in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Practical impact depends on how each integrating application validates certificate qualification and trust.

Researcher notes

The core weakness is separation between successful signature mathematics and certificate trust. A status code of 0 does not necessarily establish a trusted signer. Review both caIssuers-driven certificate retrieval and handling of nonqualified or nondetermined statuses. The supplied metadata does not define the full vulnerable release range or document exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Szafir SDK to version 1.8.463.2 or later.
  • Review vendor guidance before applying compensating controls.
  • Require trusted certificate-chain and appropriate qualification status, not verification code 0 alone.
  • Restrict affected authentication paths until upgraded if correct status enforcement cannot be confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications and services that integrate Szafir SDK.
  • Confirm the deployed SDK version is 1.8.463.2 or later.
  • Review integration logic for explicit trusted-chain and certificate-status checks.
  • Test that untrusted, nonqualified, and nondetermined certificates are rejected for authentication.
  • Check logs for authentications accepted with nonqualified or nondetermined certificate status.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-393: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-637: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9058 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCERT-PL

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9058Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Krajowa Izba RozliczeniowaSzafir SDK0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.