LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-8830: Keycloak: org.keycloak/keycloak-services: keycloak: policy bypass during webauthn credential registration via client-side javascript manipulation

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user can bypass configured WebAuthn policies during credential registration by manipulating client-side JavaScript. This occurs because the server-side processAction() fails to validate that the newly created credential's parameters, such as public key algorithms, match the realm's configured WebAuthn policies. This could lead to the creation of credentials that do not adhere to administrative security requirements, potentially weakening the overall security posture of the system by allowing non-compliant authentication methods.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Keycloak flaw lets a signed-in user register a WebAuthn credential that ignores the realm’s configured security policy. It does not expose data or allow anonymous access, but it can weaken authentication assurance by allowing non-compliant credentials into an identity system.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate identity-platform issue. It is not an emergency remote takeover based on the sources, but Keycloak protects authentication trust, so affected deployments using WebAuthn should be updated on the next controlled maintenance cycle.

Technical view

During WebAuthn credential registration, Keycloak relies on client-side JavaScript policy handling, while server-side processAction() fails to validate new credential parameters against realm WebAuthn policies. The CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3, with low complexity, required privileges, and low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 and 26.6 packages listed as affected, including rhel9, rhel9-operator, and operator-bundle builds. Systems not using WebAuthn registration or not on affected Red Hat builds appear less exposed based on available sources.

Exploitation context

The sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Abuse requires an authenticated user and affects credential policy integrity, not confidentiality or availability. Public sources provided do not include exploit code or weaponized details.

Researcher notes

The key weakness is CWE-603: client-side policy enforcement not matched by server-side validation. Useful validation focuses on whether server-side registration rejects credentials whose parameters conflict with configured WebAuthn policy. Evidence is Red Hat-specific; broader upstream impact is not established in the provided bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Red Hat CVE page and linked RHSA advisories for fixed package guidance.
  • Update affected Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 or 26.6 packages to vendor-supported unaffected builds.
  • Confirm WebAuthn realm policies remain configured as intended after updating.
  • Temporarily restrict who can register WebAuthn credentials if patching is delayed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Keycloak deployments and package versions against the affected Red Hat build entries.
  • Check whether WebAuthn credential registration is enabled for affected realms.
  • Review registered WebAuthn credentials for policy compliance where administrative requirements are strict.
  • Verify updates using Red Hat advisory package status, not only application version labels.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-603: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-8830 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-8830Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.4.13-1affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operatorunaffected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.6.3-3affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operatorunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-603 · source CWE mapping

Use of Client-Side Authentication

Use of Client-Side Authentication represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.