LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-86153: Tenda CP3 Redirect.cpp SetRedirectEnable privileges management

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This affects the function CRedirServer::SetRedirectEnable of the file Functions/Redirect.cpp. The manipulation leads to improper privilege management. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Tenda CP3 firmware 27.5.57.101 contains an access-control flaw in redirect configuration. A remote attacker who already has high privileges may improperly change this setting, potentially compromising the device and connected operations. The supplied sources do not establish exploitation in the wild or identify a vendor patch.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediate discovery and access restriction, especially where CP3 management is exposed beyond trusted networks. Schedule vendor remediation promptly when confirmed. The high impact warrants urgent attention, while the high-privilege prerequisite and absence of confirmed exploitation reduce the case for emergency shutdown based solely on supplied evidence.

Technical view

The flaw affects CRedirServer::SetRedirectEnable in Functions/Redirect.cpp and is classified as improper privilege management (CWE-266/CWE-269). CVSS 4.0 rates it 9.4: network-reachable, low complexity, no user interaction, but requiring high privileges, with potentially high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Likely exposure

Confirmed scope is limited to Tenda CP3 firmware 27.5.57.101. Exposure depends on whether affected devices are deployed and whether their management functionality is remotely reachable. The supplied evidence does not establish other affected versions, configurations, or products.

Exploitation context

Remote exploitation is described as possible, but the CVSS vector indicates an attacker must already hold high privileges. KEV is false, and no supplied source confirms active exploitation, public exploit availability, or observed attacks. Treat the flaw as serious without assuming it is currently weaponized.

Researcher notes

Public detail is limited to the affected function, file, weakness classification, version, and remote attack characterization. The supplied material does not explain the authorization boundary, vulnerable request path, authentication assumptions, affected default configuration, indicators, patch, or reliable detection method. Additional vendor or primary technical analysis is needed.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Tenda CP3 devices and identify those running firmware 27.5.57.101.
  • Restrict device management access to trusted administrators and controlled networks.
  • Review privileged accounts and revoke unnecessary, stale, or compromised access.
  • Check Tenda guidance for patched firmware or an approved mitigation.
  • Apply vendor-provided remediation when available and verify the installed version.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each CP3 device model and exact installed firmware version.
  • Test whether management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review administrator accounts, roles, and recent privileged access.
  • Inspect available management logs for unexpected redirect-setting changes.
  • Verify Tenda's current advisory and firmware status before closing remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-266: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-86153 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X——VulDB
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R2.36VulDB
9.1CVSS 3.0CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R2.36VulDB
8.3CVSS 2.0HighAV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR6.410VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-86153Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TendaCP327.5.57.101Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-266 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Privilege Assignment

Incorrect Privilege Assignment represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.