LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-85224: D-Link DNS-320 ShareCenter File Sharing file_sharing.cgi os command injection

A vulnerability was determined in D-Link DNS-320 ShareCenter 2.06B01. This affects an unknown part of the file /cgi/file_sharing.cgi of the component File Sharing. Executing a manipulation of the argument fileurl can lead to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remote attacker with high-privilege access could abuse the DNS-320 file-sharing interface to execute operating-system commands. Successful exploitation could compromise stored files, device integrity, availability, and potentially connected systems. The named affected release is firmware 2.06B01.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediate exposure reduction and asset identification. Escalate internet-accessible or broadly reachable 2.06B01 devices for urgent containment. Because no vendor fix is identified in the supplied sources, obtain current D-Link guidance and prepare replacement if supported remediation is unavailable.

Technical view

The vulnerability is an OS command injection in /cgi/file_sharing.cgi. Manipulation of the fileurl argument can reportedly reach command execution without adequate neutralization. CVSS 4.0 rates it 9.4: network-accessible, low complexity, no user interaction, but requiring high privileges.

Likely exposure

Exposure is established only for D-Link DNS-320 ShareCenter firmware 2.06B01. Risk is greatest where the file-sharing CGI endpoint is reachable by untrusted networks or privileged credentials are compromised. The sources do not establish whether other firmware versions are affected.

Exploitation context

A public exploit disclosure exists, and CVSS marks proof-of-concept maturity as present. However, the bundle reports no CISA KEV listing and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Treat exploitation as feasible, not confirmed in the wild.

Researcher notes

The record identifies CWE-77 and CWE-78 and a fileurl injection point, but does not describe the affected code path or name a vendor patch. High privileges are required according to the CVSS vector. Public disclosure increases practical risk, although field exploitation remains unconfirmed.

Mitigation direction

  • Restrict the NAS and its file-sharing interface to trusted networks and administrators.
  • Disable remote access or the affected file-sharing function where operationally acceptable.
  • Check D-Link guidance for an approved firmware update, workaround, or replacement recommendation.
  • Rotate privileged credentials if compromise or unauthorized access is suspected.
  • Monitor and block unexpected requests to /cgi/file_sharing.cgi.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory DNS-320 devices and confirm their exact firmware versions.
  • Determine whether /cgi/file_sharing.cgi is reachable from internet-facing or untrusted networks.
  • Review web, authentication, and system logs for unusual file_sharing.cgi requests or command execution indicators.
  • Confirm network restrictions prevent untrusted access to the affected interface.
  • After remediation, verify the device version and access controls against approved configuration records.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-85224 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P——VulDB
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.36VulDB
9.1CVSS 3.0CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.36VulDB
8.3CVSS 2.0HighAV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR6.410VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-85224Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
D-LinkDNS-320 ShareCenter2.06B01Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.