LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-85110: Tenda HG10 Boa Web Server formWlanSetup buffer overflow

A vulnerability was identified in Tenda HG10 300001138. Impacted is the function formWlanSetup of the file /boaform/formWlanSetup of the component Boa Web Server. The manipulation of the argument ssid leads to buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remotely reachable flaw in the Tenda HG10 wireless configuration interface can corrupt device memory when processing the SSID field. A public proof of concept exists. The supplied evidence most directly demonstrates denial of service; it does not establish active exploitation or confirmed code execution.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediate exposure reduction and vendor follow-up. Public proof-of-concept availability, remote reachability, and critical scoring justify urgent action for affected devices. Do not assume compromise solely from this disclosure; investigate suspicious restarts or configuration activity and plan isolation or replacement if no supported fix exists.

Technical view

CVE-2026-85110 affects formWlanSetup at /boaform/formWlanSetup in Tenda HG10 version 300001138. Manipulating the ssid argument triggers a CWE-119/CWE-120 buffer overflow. The CVSS 2.0 vector indicates network access, low complexity, and single authentication. Its impact rating is broad, although the submitted evidence specifically identifies denial of service.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where Tenda HG10 devices running version 300001138 permit untrusted users to reach the Boa management interface. Authentication appears required. Internet-facing or broadly reachable administration significantly increases risk; the bundle provides no deployment prevalence data.

Exploitation context

A public proof of concept is referenced, making reproduction more accessible. The source bundle says remote exploitation is possible, but KEV is false and no cited evidence confirms exploitation in the wild. Treat public exploit availability as elevated risk, not proof of active attacks.

Researcher notes

The evidence identifies an ssid-triggered buffer overflow in a specific Boa handler. CVSS claims complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but the referenced submission describes denial of service. Authentication is indicated by Au:S and the CTI reference tag. No vendor advisory, fixed release, or reliable in-the-wild exploitation evidence is supplied.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and restrict HG10 management access to trusted administrative networks.
  • Prevent internet access to the Boa administration interface.
  • Check Tenda guidance for patched firmware or vendor-approved mitigation.
  • Use strong, unique administrator credentials while authentication remains a required control.
  • Replace or isolate affected devices if no supported remediation is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Tenda HG10 devices and confirm their installed firmware versions.
  • Verify whether /boaform/formWlanSetup is reachable from untrusted networks without sending malicious input.
  • Confirm management access requires authentication and is limited to authorized administrators.
  • Review device logs for unexpected restarts, configuration changes, or suspicious management access.
  • Recheck Tenda guidance and the CVE record for remediation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-85110 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-85110Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TendaHG10300001138Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.