LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-8430: SPIP < 4.4.14 Remote Code Execution via nginx

SPIP versions prior to 4.4.14 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the public space that is limited to certain nginx configurations, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the web server. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability through specific nginx configuration scenarios to achieve code execution, and this issue is not mitigated by the SPIP security screen.

CriticalCVSS 9.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-8430 is a critical SPIP remote code execution issue affecting versions before 4.4.14, but only in specific nginx configurations. A successful unauthenticated attack could run code as the web server. The sources do not show active exploitation or KEV listing.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any internet-facing SPIP site using nginx. The impact is server-side code execution, but exploitability depends on configuration, so response should combine rapid upgrade with targeted exposure validation.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-94 code injection in SPIP public space. CVSS 4.0 score is 9.2 with network attack vector, no privileges, no user interaction, high complexity, and required attack preconditions tied to nginx configuration. The SPIP security screen does not mitigate it.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely for public SPIP sites running versions before 4.4.14 with the vulnerable nginx configuration scenarios described by the advisories. Apache-only or non-vulnerable nginx deployments are not established as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle states attackers can execute arbitrary code through specific nginx configuration scenarios. KEV is false, and no cited source in the bundle states active exploitation. Preconditions matter, so prioritize internet-facing SPIP/nginx instances first.

Researcher notes

The affected-product metadata appears sparse, while the narrative clearly says SPIP before 4.4.14. Validate against the CVE record and vendor advisory before broad assertions. Do not assume exploit activity without new KEV or source evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade SPIP to 4.4.14 or later per vendor guidance.
  • Review SPIP and nginx guidance for vulnerable configuration scenarios.
  • Do not treat the SPIP security screen as mitigation.
  • Prioritize public SPIP instances before internal-only deployments.
  • Monitor vendor and CVE updates for revised affected-version details.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all SPIP sites and record exact versions.
  • Identify SPIP deployments served through nginx.
  • Compare nginx configuration against vendor and VulnCheck advisory conditions.
  • Confirm upgraded systems report SPIP 4.4.14 or later.
  • Check logs for suspicious public-space requests after exposure dates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-8430 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.2 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.2CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.2Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-8430Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SPIPSPIP0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.