LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-84197: In Eclipse Ditto's Node.js JavaScript client, all released versions of @eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-clie...

In Eclipse Ditto's Node.js JavaScript client, all released versions of @eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-client-node from 2.0.0 to 3.9.0 and of its predecessor package @eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-client-node_1.0 from 1.0.0 to 2.1.0, the WebSocket transport hard-codes rejectUnauthorized: false when creating the underlying ws WebSocket. Certificate chain and hostname validation are therefore disabled for every wss:// connection, and no builder option, constructor argument or environment variable lets an application turn validation back on. An attacker in a position to intercept the connection can present an arbitrary certificate, complete the TLS handshake, read the credentials that the configured authentication provider sends in the Authorization header of the WebSocket upgrade request, and read, alter or inject Ditto Protocol messages for the lifetime of the connection. The Java client, the browser/DOM JavaScript client and the HTTP transport of the Node.js client are not affected.

CriticalCVSS 9.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

The affected Node.js clients silently trust any certificate for secure WebSocket connections. An attacker able to intercept network traffic could impersonate the Ditto endpoint, steal authentication credentials, and read or manipulate messages. The supplied sources rate this critical, but provide no evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent remediation and credential-exposure review for affected production deployments. Prioritize systems carrying sensitive device data, commands, or privileged credentials, especially across untrusted networks. Do not infer compromise solely from package presence, but do not defer action because exploitation has not been publicly reported.

Technical view

The WebSocket transport hard-codes rejectUnauthorized: false, disabling certificate-chain and hostname validation for wss:// connections without a supported override. This enables an on-path attacker to complete TLS using an arbitrary certificate, capture the WebSocket Authorization header, and alter Ditto Protocol traffic. Node.js HTTP transport, Java clients, and browser/DOM JavaScript clients are unaffected.

Likely exposure

Exposure requires the affected Node.js package and its WebSocket transport using wss://. The stated affected ranges are @eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-client-node 2.0.0–3.9.0 and predecessor @eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-client-node_1.0 1.0.0–2.1.0. Risk is greatest across untrusted or interceptable networks.

Exploitation context

Exploitation requires an attacker positioned to intercept the client connection. No privileges or user interaction are required after obtaining that position. The bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV and provides no cited evidence of exploitation in the wild; this does not prove exploitation has never occurred.

Researcher notes

This is improper certificate and hostname validation, mapped to CWE-295, CWE-297, and CWE-300. The defect is unconditional in the described WebSocket construction path and reportedly cannot be reversed through configuration. The supplied material does not identify a patched version, workaround, proof of concept, or observed exploitation campaign.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify deployments using either affected Node.js package and the WebSocket transport.
  • Check Eclipse guidance for a corrected release or supported remediation; none is named in the supplied sources.
  • Avoid affected wss:// connections until certificate validation can be restored through a vendor-supported solution.
  • Restrict network paths and endpoint access to reduce opportunities for connection interception.
  • After remediation, rotate credentials that may have traversed affected WebSocket connections.

Validation and detection

  • Review dependency manifests and lockfiles for both affected package names and stated version ranges.
  • Confirm whether each deployment uses Node.js WebSocket transport rather than unaffected HTTP, Java, or browser clients.
  • In an authorized test environment, verify wss:// connections reject untrusted certificates and hostname mismatches.
  • Review relevant credential and Ditto message activity for unexpected use or modification.
  • Confirm deployed remediation against current Eclipse advisory guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-297: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-300: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-84197 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.2 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.2CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——eclipse

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.2Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-84197Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Eclipse FoundationEclipse Ditto@eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-client-node, 2.0.0, 3.9.0unaffected
Eclipse FoundationEclipse Ditto@eclipse-ditto/ditto-javascript-client-node_1.0, 1.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-295 · source CWE mapping

Improper Certificate Validation

Improper Certificate Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-297 · source CWE mapping

Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch

Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-300 · source CWE mapping

Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint

Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.