LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-82908: MSI Dragon Center MMIO Write Path NTIOLib_X64.sys MmioWritePath integer overflow

A vulnerability was found in MSI Dragon Center up to 2.0.155.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function MmioWritePath in the library NTIOLib_X64.sys of the component MMIO Write Path Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument count/elementSize results in integer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

MSI Dragon Center through version 2.0.155.0 contains an integer-overflow flaw in a low-level hardware-access driver. A low-privileged attacker already present on a system could target it without user interaction. The supplied assessment rates potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact as high. This is not described as remotely exploitable.

Executive priority

Prioritize rapid inventory and containment on shared, privileged, or high-value systems. The critical score and public exploit reference raise urgency, but exploitation requires local access and is not confirmed in the wild. Because the sources name no fix and report no vendor response, track this as unresolved vendor risk until authoritative remediation appears.

Technical view

MmioWritePath in NTIOLib_X64.sys mishandles count and elementSize values, producing an integer overflow classified under CWE-189/CWE-190. The supplied CVSS 4.0 vector is 9.3: local, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, with high system and subsequent-system impacts. The bundle does not establish the precise corruption primitive or reliable impact achieved.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems with MSI Dragon Center version 2.0.155.0 or earlier and the NTIOLib_X64.sys component present. Exploitation requires local access and low privileges, so internet exposure alone is not decisive. The bundle does not describe default installation scope or whether every installation loads the affected path.

Exploitation context

A public exploit is referenced, so practical testing material may be available. However, the bundle marks KEV false, and no supplied source reports active in-the-wild exploitation. Treat public availability as increased likelihood, not proof of current attacks.

Researcher notes

The record attributes the issue to arithmetic involving count and elementSize in MmioWritePath. It provides insufficient evidence to conclude exact memory-corruption behavior, privilege escalation, exploit reliability, or affected driver builds independent of Dragon Center. The vendor reportedly did not respond. Analyze only in an isolated, authorized environment; the supplied sources do not name a patch.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems running MSI Dragon Center through version 2.0.155.0 and identify NTIOLib_X64.sys.
  • Check MSI guidance for a corrected version or mitigation; the supplied sources identify no patch.
  • Remove Dragon Center from systems where it is unnecessary, following normal change-control procedures.
  • Restrict local logon and software execution to trusted users on affected systems until remediation is confirmed.
  • Monitor for unexpected access to NTIOLib_X64.sys or Dragon Center components.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed Dragon Center versions across managed systems against the affected range.
  • Check whether NTIOLib_X64.sys is present and associated Dragon Center services are active.
  • Verify any vendor-provided update or mitigation against MSI guidance before closing findings.
  • Review endpoint telemetry for unusual driver interaction by low-privileged processes.
  • After remediation, confirm the affected version and driver were removed or replaced as intended.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-189: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-82908 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P——VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R26VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R26VulDB
6.8CVSS 2.0MediumAV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR3.110VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-82908Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MSIDragon Center2.0.155Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-189 · source CWE mapping

Numeric Errors

Numeric Errors represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.