LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-82281: Kotaemon Missing Ownership Check in Conversation Functions

Kotaemon through 0.12.0 fails to properly validate conversation ownership in select_conv, delete_conv, rename_conv, and on_set_public_conversation functions in control.py. Attackers can read other users' chat histories, delete conversations, or rename conversations by supplying arbitrary conversation identifiers without proper authorization checks.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Kotaemon through 0.12.0 may let an attacker use another user’s conversation identifier to view chat history or rename or delete conversations. This creates serious confidentiality and integrity risk, particularly where chats contain sensitive business, customer, or security information.

Executive priority

Treat internet-facing or multi-user deployments as an immediate remediation priority because chat confidentiality and integrity are at risk. Determine whether sensitive information was stored, restrict exposure, and obtain a vendor-confirmed fix. Active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence.

Technical view

The affected control.py functions—select_conv, delete_conv, rename_conv, and on_set_public_conversation—do not consistently verify that the requested conversation belongs to the acting user. This is an insecure direct object reference categorized as CWE-639. The supplied CVSS 4.0 score is 9.1.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure exists in network-accessible, multi-user Kotaemon deployments running through version 0.12.0. Single-user or strongly access-restricted instances have less practical exposure. The supplied affected-version metadata is inconsistent, so organizations should confirm applicability against the CVE record and vendor project.

Exploitation context

The supplied CVSS vector indicates network reachability, no required privileges, no user interaction, high attack complexity, and a prerequisite condition. The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation or a public exploit.

Researcher notes

The reported weakness affects object-level authorization across four conversation handlers. Validate ownership enforcement on every server-side path, including public-conversation state changes. The source bundle names versions through 0.12.0, but its structured affected entry is ambiguous; no corrected version or explicit patch is provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize network-accessible Kotaemon deployments through version 0.12.0.
  • Check the vendor issue and advisory for a confirmed corrected release or official mitigation.
  • Restrict affected deployments to trusted users and networks pending remediation.
  • Require server-side ownership checks for every conversation read, delete, rename, and publication operation.

Validation and detection

  • Record the deployed Kotaemon version and whether multiple users can access the instance.
  • Review control.py for ownership authorization before each affected conversation operation.
  • Test that one account cannot access or modify another account’s conversations.
  • Review application logs for unusual cross-account conversation access, deletion, renaming, or publication attempts.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-82281 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck
7.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.25.2VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-82281Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Cinnamonkotaemon0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-639 · source CWE mapping

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.