LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-82090: Pocket through 8.33.0.0 allows XSS because "Save to Pocket" injects external HTML into the DOM.

Pocket through 8.33.0.0 allows XSS because "Save to Pocket" injects external HTML into the DOM.  JavaScript code can alter the application state via native bridge methods.

CriticalCVSS 9.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Pocket through version 8.33.0.0 may place untrusted external HTML inside the application. Embedded JavaScript could then use native bridge methods to change application state, creating serious confidentiality, integrity, and availability risk.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate mobile application risk-assessment and containment priority. Focus first on devices accessing sensitive corporate data. Public exploit-oriented material increases urgency, but evidence of real-world exploitation and an authoritative fixed version is absent from the supplied sources.

Technical view

This is a CWE-79 cross-site scripting vulnerability in Pocket's “Save to Pocket” handling. The CVSS 4.0 assessment is 9.2 critical, with network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction stated; attack requirements are present. The vulnerable JavaScript context can reportedly invoke native bridge methods.

Likely exposure

Exposure is indicated for the Pocket Android package com.ideashower.readitlater.pro through 8.33.0.0. The supplied affected-version metadata also contains an ambiguous “0” entry and unknown default status, so inventories require careful version confirmation.

Exploitation context

A public third-party repository is tagged as technical and exploit material. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no source provided establishes active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The core issue is a trust-boundary failure between externally sourced HTML, an embedded JavaScript environment, and privileged native bridge methods. The supplied record does not specify bridge methods, affected application states, patch commits, or a fixed release. Version metadata is internally unclear, limiting definitive exposure conclusions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Pocket Android installations and identify versions through 8.33.0.0.
  • Remove or disable affected installations where operationally acceptable until authoritative remediation is confirmed.
  • Restrict use of “Save to Pocket” with untrusted external content.
  • Check Pocket or platform-owner guidance for a fixed version or supported mitigation.
  • Prioritize managed mobile devices holding sensitive accounts or business data.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the installed Android package name and application version on managed devices.
  • Verify affected installations are removed, disabled, or updated after authoritative guidance becomes available.
  • Review mobile security telemetry for suspicious Pocket web-content or native-bridge activity.
  • Confirm any replacement version falls outside the vendor-confirmed affected range.
  • Monitor the CVE record and cited repository for clarified version and remediation information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-82090 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.2 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.2CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——mitre

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.2Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-82090Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
getpocketPocketcom.ideashower.readitlater.pro, 0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.