LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-80202: Kimai before 2.56.0 Authorization Bypass via TimesheetVoter

Kimai before 2.56.0 does not enforce team-membership checks in TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute(), which maps permissions only to own_timesheet or other_timesheet. As a result, any authenticated user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD (or a role holding edit_other_timesheet/delete_other_timesheet) can read, modify, and permanently delete timesheets belonging to any user system-wide via the API, regardless of team membership. Timesheet IDs are sequential integers and trivially enumerable. ROLE_USER accounts are correctly restricted. (Note: the maintainers characterize this behavior as matching the documented permission model.)

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Kimai authorization weakness can let a team lead, or another account with powerful timesheet permissions, access timesheets across the entire system instead of only within its team. This may expose employee time records and allow unauthorized changes or permanent deletion. Ordinary ROLE_USER accounts are reported as correctly restricted.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent access-control issue where affected Kimai instances contain team leads or delegated timesheet administrators. Prioritize version verification, permission reduction, log preservation, and upgrading. Investigate possible unauthorized changes or deletions because compromise could affect confidentiality, payroll-related integrity, operational records, and recoverability.

Technical view

In Kimai versions before 2.56.0, TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute() maps authorization to own_timesheet or other_timesheet permissions without enforcing team membership. Authenticated ROLE_TEAMLEAD accounts, or roles with edit_other_timesheet or delete_other_timesheet, may read, alter, or permanently delete any user's timesheets through the API. Sequential timesheet identifiers increase discoverability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Kimai deployments before 2.56.0 containing ROLE_TEAMLEAD accounts or custom roles with the named cross-user permissions. API reachability increases practical risk. ROLE_USER-only accounts are not reported as affected. The supplied CVSS vector states PR:N, but the description requires authentication; administrators should treat that discrepancy cautiously.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in CISA KEV. Exploitation nevertheless appears operationally plausible because affected permissions are commonly assigned to trusted users and timesheet identifiers are sequential. No exploit code or confirmed campaign evidence is provided.

Researcher notes

The core issue is missing team-membership enforcement rather than an unauthenticated authentication bypass. The maintainers reportedly characterize the behavior as consistent with the documented permission model, creating ambiguity about expected authorization boundaries. The supplied record nevertheless identifies versions before 2.56.0 as affected. Confirm behavior and remediation against the current vendor advisory before final risk acceptance.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Kimai installations to version 2.56.0 or later after checking vendor guidance.
  • Temporarily remove unnecessary edit_other_timesheet and delete_other_timesheet permissions from non-administrator roles.
  • Restrict API access to trusted networks or authenticated gateways where operationally feasible.
  • Preserve and review audit, API, and application logs before making access-control changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory every Kimai instance and confirm its exact installed version.
  • Identify accounts holding ROLE_TEAMLEAD or roles containing the affected cross-user permissions.
  • Verify in staging that team leads cannot access or alter out-of-team timesheets.
  • Review logs for cross-team timesheet reads, modifications, enumeration patterns, and permanent deletions.
  • Confirm backups can restore deleted timesheet records and related audit evidence.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-80202 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-80202Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
kimaikimai0, 2.56.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.