LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-79774: Winter CMS before 1.2.13 Twig Sandbox Escape via SecurityPolicy

Winter CMS versions before 1.2.13 contain an incomplete fix for a Twig sandbox escape vulnerability in System\\Twig\\SecurityPolicy that allows authenticated backend users with template-editing permissions to bypass sandbox restrictions. Attackers can exploit method forwarding through Eloquent models and query builders using methods like saveQuietly(), deleteQuietly(), increment(), decrement(), and newQuery() to read and modify arbitrary database records, execute arbitrary SQL, and achieve remote code execution by injecting PHP into template code sections.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A backend user who can edit Winter CMS templates may escape the intended security sandbox. Successful abuse could expose or alter database information, run unauthorized database operations, and ultimately execute code on the server, threatening confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent remediation for affected systems. Prioritize externally reachable or business-critical installations and those with multiple template editors. Restrict privileged access immediately if upgrading cannot occur promptly, then investigate for suspicious template, database, or backend-account activity.

Technical view

Before version 1.2.13, System\Twig\SecurityPolicy incompletely restricts method forwarding through Eloquent models and query builders. An authenticated backend user with template-editing permission can bypass Twig sandbox controls, access or change arbitrary database records, execute arbitrary SQL, and inject PHP into template code sections for remote code execution.

Likely exposure

Internet-reachable Winter CMS installations earlier than 1.2.13 are the primary concern, particularly where backend accounts have template-editing permissions. Exploitation requires an authenticated, highly privileged backend user, so compromised, shared, or unnecessarily privileged accounts materially increase exposure.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Exploitation is nevertheless high impact because a suitably privileged backend user can cross the template sandbox boundary and potentially take control of the application and its data.

Researcher notes

The weakness is categorized as CWE-693, Protection Mechanism Failure, and is described as an incomplete sandbox fix. The bundle is internally inconsistent: its structured affected list includes 1.2.13 while the title and description say versions before 1.2.13. Confirm exact applicability with the vendor advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Winter CMS to version 1.2.13 or later, following the vendor advisory and normal change controls.
  • Until upgraded, remove template-editing permission from accounts that do not strictly require it.
  • Review backend accounts, strengthen authentication, and invalidate credentials where compromise is suspected.
  • For custom forks, incorporate the vendor patch and assess local Twig policy modifications.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Winter CMS installations and confirm each installed version is 1.2.13 or newer.
  • Identify every backend account with template-editing permission and verify that access is necessary.
  • Review template changes, database anomalies, and application logs for suspicious privileged activity.
  • Confirm custom forks contain the vendor patch and test that sandbox restrictions remain enforced.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-79774 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H——VulnCheck
8.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.76VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-79774Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
wintercmswinter1.2.7, 1.2.13unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.