LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-78260: WordPress Epayco plugin <= 8.4.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability

Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Epayco <= 8.4.6 versions.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-78260 is a critical SQL injection flaw reported in the WordPress Epayco plugin through version 8.4.6. An unauthenticated internet user may reach the vulnerable functionality without an account or user interaction. Successful abuse could expose sensitive database information and cause limited service disruption. The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate remediation priority for internet-facing systems. Assign ownership now, inventory affected installations, and obtain authoritative fix guidance. Because potential data disclosure is high and no authentication is required, delays increase business risk. The sources do not prove active attacks, so incident escalation should depend on environment-specific evidence.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-89 SQL injection with CVSS 3.1 score 9.3. Its vector indicates remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation requiring no user interaction, with high confidentiality impact, no stated integrity impact, and low availability impact. The bundle does not identify the vulnerable parameter, endpoint, root cause, patched version, or vendor-approved mitigation.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure is highest for internet-accessible WordPress installations running epayco-gateway version 8.4.6 or earlier. Confirm exposure through plugin inventories rather than assuming all WordPress systems are affected. The bundle’s structured affected record contains inconsistent version metadata, so exact applicability should be verified against current vendor or Patchstack guidance.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability characteristics suggest a low barrier to remote abuse because authentication and user interaction are not required. However, KEV status is false, and no supplied source confirms exploitation in the wild, public exploit availability, or a specific attack campaign. Treat it as urgent based on technical severity, not evidence of active compromise.

Researcher notes

The supplied evidence supports the CVE classification, severity, and affected-version claim, but lacks endpoint-level details and remediation information. The structured affected entry lists versions as “n/a” and default status as “unaffected,” conflicting with the title and description stating Epayco through 8.4.6 is vulnerable. Preserve that uncertainty during product matching and version-range validation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify every WordPress installation using the Epayco plugin and record its installed version.
  • Check current ePayco and Patchstack guidance for a confirmed fixed release or vendor-approved mitigation.
  • Prioritize upgrading once a fixed version is confirmed by an authoritative source.
  • If no fix is available, consider temporarily deactivating the plugin after assessing business impact.
  • Restrict unnecessary public access and increase monitoring until remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Verify plugin versions directly from each WordPress installation and reconcile them with asset inventory.
  • Confirm whether affected installations are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review web and database logs for unusual requests, SQL errors, or unexpected query activity.
  • Confirm remediation by rechecking the installed version against authoritative fixed-version guidance.
  • Use non-destructive security testing only with authorization and avoid testing production data paths.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-78260 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L3.94.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-78260Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ePaycoEpaycoepayco-gateway, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.