LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-78003: Mailgun for WordPress <= 2.2.0 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via 'addresses' Array Keys

The Mailgun for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via path traversal in versions up to and including 2.2.0. This is due to insufficient input validation in the add_list() function, which accepts user-controlled array keys from $_POST['addresses'], passes them through sanitize_text_field(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make authenticated POST requests to any Mailgun API endpoint using the WordPress site's API key, including creating inbound email-forwarding routes that can intercept password reset emails, leading to administrator account takeover.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A public-facing WordPress site using Mailgun for WordPress through version 2.2.0 may let an unauthenticated attacker misuse the site’s Mailgun credentials. The reported impact includes creating email-forwarding routes, intercepting password-reset messages, and potentially taking over administrator accounts.

Executive priority

Treat affected, internet-accessible installations as an immediate remediation priority because reported abuse could expose email and enable administrator takeover. Establish exposure today, follow vendor guidance, and investigate Mailgun routes and account activity. Avoid declaring compromise solely from version detection.

Technical view

Insufficient validation in add_list() reportedly allows attacker-controlled keys in the addresses POST array to alter the Mailgun API path. The plugin sanitizes these keys as text but does not adequately prevent path traversal, enabling unauthenticated requests that the site authenticates with its Mailgun API key.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where Mailgun for WordPress version 2.2.0 or earlier is active and configured with a usable Mailgun API key. The supplied evidence does not establish whether every configuration is reachable or exploitable. The affected-version metadata contains an inconsistent “0” entry, while the description explicitly states versions through 2.2.0.

Exploitation context

The supplied bundle reports a low-complexity, unauthenticated attack path with severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability consequences. However, the CVE is not marked as KEV, and no supplied source establishes active exploitation, public exploit availability, or observed attacks.

Researcher notes

The core issue is path manipulation through attacker-controlled addresses array keys before authenticated Mailgun API requests. Supplied code references support review of add_list() and related request construction. Evidence is incomplete regarding a fixed version, vendor-endorsed workaround, configuration prerequisites, active exploitation, and the inconsistent structured affected-version entry.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites running Mailgun for WordPress and record installed versions.
  • Check current Mailgun or plugin vendor guidance for a confirmed fixed release or mitigation.
  • Consider disabling the plugin until confirmed safe, accounting for email-delivery dependencies.
  • Rotate the Mailgun API key if misuse is suspected, then update dependent configuration.
  • Review and remove unauthorized Mailgun routes using approved administrative processes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Mailgun for WordPress version 2.2.0 or earlier is installed and active.
  • Determine whether the plugin stores a valid Mailgun API key.
  • Inspect Mailgun audit activity for unexpected API requests or configuration changes.
  • Review inbound routes for unauthorized forwarding destinations or recent additions.
  • Investigate unusual password-reset emails, administrator changes, and account-access events.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-78003 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
4Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-78003Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
mailgunMailgun for WordPress0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery

Server-Side Request Forgery represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.