LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-77651: The arrayref crate 0.3.10 for Rust can trigger execution of malicious code when compiling a project that us...

The arrayref crate 0.3.10 for Rust can trigger execution of malicious code when compiling a project that uses the crate, because it has a rogue dependency that registers with a command-and-control server to offer arbitrary code execution.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A malicious release of the Rust arrayref package can run attacker-controlled code while software is being compiled. Organizations that built projects using version 0.3.10 may have exposed developer machines, CI systems, source code, credentials, and produced artifacts. Exposure requires investigation even if the resulting application was never deployed.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed compilation as an incident-response priority, not merely dependency maintenance. Immediately identify affected builds and protect CI credentials, signing keys, repositories, and deployment systems. If version 0.3.10 appears only in an inventory without evidence it was compiled, validate build history before declaring compromise.

Technical view

CVE-2026-77651 is a software supply-chain compromise affecting arrayref 0.3.10. The release contains a rogue dependency that registers with command-and-control infrastructure and enables arbitrary code execution during compilation. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, with potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited by the supplied record to projects that resolved and compiled arrayref version 0.3.10. Direct and transitive dependencies both matter. CI runners and developer workstations are the primary investigation targets, particularly where builds had network access or access to source repositories, signing material, deployment credentials, or other secrets.

Exploitation context

The malicious package behavior is established by the supplied sources, but the bundle does not establish how many downstream systems were compromised. The CVE is not listed as KEV. That does not prove exploitation is absent; it means active exploitation should not be claimed from the supplied evidence.

Researcher notes

The defining issue is build-time malicious behavior, categorized as CWE-506, rather than a conventional runtime flaw. Dependency resolution records and build-host evidence are therefore more informative than production application scanning alone. The supplied record names only version 0.3.10; broader affected-version claims, a specific safe version, victim prevalence, and active exploitation are not established here.

Mitigation direction

  • Immediately block and remove arrayref 0.3.10 from dependency manifests, lockfiles, caches, and build pipelines.
  • Isolate systems that compiled the affected version until investigation determines whether malicious code ran.
  • Rebuild affected artifacts in clean environments using dependency versions confirmed safe by Rust or RustSec guidance.
  • Rotate build credentials and secrets where telemetry indicates execution or possible exposure.
  • Review Rust and RustSec advisories for updates; the supplied evidence does not identify a specific patched version.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests, Cargo.lock files, SBOMs, and artifact provenance for exact version 0.3.10.
  • Review CI and developer build histories to identify where and when version 0.3.10 was compiled.
  • Examine build-host network telemetry for unexpected command-and-control registration during affected compilation periods.
  • Review endpoint telemetry for unexplained processes, file changes, credential access, or persistence during those periods.
  • Confirm clean rebuilds no longer resolve version 0.3.10 and produce expected dependency inventories.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-506: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-77651 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9mitre

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-77651Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
droundyarrayref0.3.10unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-506 · source CWE mapping

Embedded Malicious Code

Embedded Malicious Code represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.