LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-76589: TRENDnet TEW-755AP mycli FUN_401000 stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was found in TRENDnet TEW-755AP up to 20260702. Affected is the function FUN_401000 of the file /sbin/mycli. The manipulation of the argument ssid results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remotely reachable flaw in the TRENDnet TEW-755AP can overflow device memory when a crafted SSID reaches the mycli component. A low-privileged attacker could potentially compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Public proof-of-concept material increases urgency, but the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate asset-discovery and containment priority because impact is critical and proof-of-concept material is public. Determine whether affected access points exist, restrict management exposure, and obtain vendor remediation guidance. Escalate replacement planning if TRENDnet provides no supported fix.

Technical view

CVE-2026-76589 is a stack-based buffer overflow in FUN_401000 within /sbin/mycli, triggered through the ssid argument. It is scored CVSS 3.1 9.9: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

The bundle identifies TRENDnet TEW-755AP firmware up to 20260702, although its structured affected list names 20260702 specifically. Devices are higher risk where untrusted or low-privileged users can remotely reach the vulnerable functionality. Exact exposure pathways and vendor-confirmed version boundaries are not provided.

Exploitation context

Public proof-of-concept code is referenced, so technical details may be readily available to attackers. However, the bundle marks this CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of observed exploitation in the wild. Public exploit availability must not be treated as confirmed active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The source bundle maps the issue to CWE-119 and CWE-121 and reports remote reachability with low privileges required. It does not document the vulnerable protocol, affected interface, patch status, vendor acknowledgment, or confirmed exploitation. The discrepancy between “up to 20260702” and the structured version entry warrants vendor verification.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all TEW-755AP devices and record their firmware versions.
  • Check TRENDnet guidance for confirmed affected versions, updates, or mitigations.
  • Restrict device management access to trusted administrators and networks.
  • Isolate exposed devices until vendor remediation status is confirmed.
  • Prioritize replacement if no supported security update becomes available.

Validation and detection

  • Compare discovered firmware versions against TRENDnet's confirmed affected-version guidance.
  • Verify untrusted networks cannot reach device management functionality.
  • Review device and network logs for unusual administrative access or configuration changes.
  • Confirm any vendor update is installed and persists after reboot.
  • Retest access controls after mitigation without using public exploit code.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-76589 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R3.16VulDB
9.9CVSS 3.0CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R3.16VulDB
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P——VulDB
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-76589Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TRENDnetTEW-755AP20260702Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.