LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-76008: Comfast CF-N1-S URI Parameter Parsing mbox-config get_para_from_uri stack-based overflow

A flaw has been found in Comfast CF-N1-S 2.6.0.1. This affects the function get_para_from_uri of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config of the component URI Parameter Parsing. This manipulation of the argument width/height causes stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Comfast CF-N1-S devices running firmware 2.6.0.1 reportedly contain a memory-safety flaw in a web-facing CGI component. A remote, unauthenticated request involving width or height parameters could crash the device or compromise its data and operations. The supplied sources do not identify a patch or confirm attacks in the wild.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate inventory and containment priority wherever CF-N1-S devices may be deployed. Prioritize internet-reachable or operationally important devices running 2.6.0.1. Critical technical severity supports rapid exposure reduction, while the absence of confirmed exploitation and patch information means teams should avoid overstating incident likelihood and actively seek vendor guidance.

Technical view

The reported stack-based buffer overflow occurs in get_para_from_uri within /cgi-bin/mbox-config while parsing width or height URI parameters. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high impacts across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Only CF-N1-S version 2.6.0.1 is identified as affected.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where CF-N1-S devices run firmware 2.6.0.1 and the affected CGI interface is reachable from the internet or another untrusted network. The bundle does not establish whether the endpoint is enabled by default, management-only, or commonly exposed. Other versions should not be presumed affected without vendor confirmation.

Exploitation context

Remote initiation is reported, and the CVSS vector describes favorable attack conditions. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV, and none of the supplied evidence confirms active exploitation. The related GitHub repository may warrant defensive review, but the bundle provides insufficient detail to characterize it as a working public exploit.

Researcher notes

The evidence identifies the vulnerable function, CGI path, parameters, weakness classes, and one affected firmware version. It does not provide vendor confirmation, patch details, default reachability, crash evidence, or verified exploitation status. CWE-119 and CWE-121 support the memory-corruption classification. Safe validation should emphasize inventory, configuration review, and telemetry rather than triggering the overflow.

Mitigation direction

  • Restrict untrusted network access to affected devices and their web management interface.
  • Isolate confirmed 2.6.0.1 devices on segmented networks pending vendor guidance.
  • Apply vendor-approved fixed firmware when Comfast identifies one; the supplied sources name no patch.
  • Monitor for unusual requests to /cgi-bin/mbox-config and unexpected device restarts.
  • Replace or retire devices if no supported remediation becomes available and exposure cannot be reduced.

Validation and detection

  • Identify all Comfast CF-N1-S devices and record their installed firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether version 2.6.0.1 is present; do not assume other versions are affected.
  • Determine whether /cgi-bin/mbox-config is reachable from internet or other untrusted networks.
  • Review device, proxy, and security logs for malformed width or height requests and unexplained crashes.
  • Check Comfast guidance for confirmed affected releases and a fixed firmware version.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-76008 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X——VulDB
10CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R3.96VulDB
10CVSS 3.0CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R3.96VulDB
10CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR1010VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

10Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-76008Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ComfastCF-N1-S2.6.0.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.