CVE-2026-75746: ColdFusion | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A remotely reachable ColdFusion flaw can let a highly privileged attacker turn unsafe database input into code execution under the application’s current user. No user interaction is required. Successful exploitation could expose data, alter systems, or disrupt service. The supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat this as an urgent remediation item for affected, network-accessible ColdFusion systems. Prioritize systems holding sensitive data or reachable by privileged external users. High privileges are required, but successful exploitation could produce full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact across a security boundary.
Technical view
CVE-2026-75746 is a CWE-89 SQL injection vulnerability with CVSS 3.1 score 9.1. It is network-accessible, low-complexity, requires high privileges, needs no user interaction, and changes scope. Successful exploitation can execute arbitrary code as the current user, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Potential exposure includes ColdFusion 2025 and ColdFusion 2023 installations matching the supplied affected-version entries, especially network-accessible systems where an attacker can obtain high-privilege access. The bundle encodes versions as 0–13 and 0–24 respectively; administrators should confirm exact affected update ranges in Adobe’s advisory.
Exploitation context
Exploitation requires high privileges but no victim interaction, reducing exposure to unauthenticated attackers while making compromised privileged accounts particularly dangerous. The low-complexity, network-accessible path and possible code execution justify urgent handling. The CVE is not identified as KEV, and the supplied sources provide no evidence of exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
The supplied version records use paired values, 0–13 for ColdFusion 2025 and 0–24 for ColdFusion 2023, without explaining boundary semantics. Confirm exact affected and corrected update levels with Adobe. No public exploit, indicators of compromise, attack path details, or active-exploitation evidence are included in the bundle.
Mitigation direction
Consult Adobe advisory APSB26-119 for the exact fixed versions and installation instructions.
Apply Adobe’s recommended remediation to affected ColdFusion installations as soon as operationally feasible.
Restrict ColdFusion management and application interfaces to trusted networks and authorized users.
Review and reduce privileged ColdFusion accounts until remediation is complete.
Use least-privilege service accounts to limit the impact of possible code execution.
Validation and detection
Inventory ColdFusion 2025 and 2023 installations, including their installed update levels.
Compare each installation against the affected and fixed versions documented in APSB26-119.
Confirm Adobe’s remediation installed successfully and services returned to their expected versions.
Verify privileged access paths are restricted and unnecessary accounts are disabled.
Review application, database, authentication, and system logs for unexplained privileged activity or code execution.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup
Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-89 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.