CVE-2026-75604: Next.js: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution on windows-hosted servers
Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.0 until 15.5.24 and 16.3.3, Next.js applications using Pages Router or App Router without Cache Components on Windows-hosted servers do not consistently escape backslashes in route segments before constructing incremental-cache paths. In packages/next/src/shared/lib/router/utils/escape-path-delimiters.ts and packages/next/src/server/lib/incremental-cache/file-system-cache.ts, a remote request can supply encoded Windows path separators that traverse outside the intended cache root and expose private build data, including the server-reference-manifest encryption key. Disclosure of that key can enable remote code execution in the affected application. This issue is fixed in versions 15.5.24 and 16.3.3.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A remote, unauthenticated attacker may abuse path handling in affected Next.js applications hosted on Windows to access private build data. Exposure of a server encryption key can then enable application-level remote code execution. The attack is rated critical, although the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat affected internet-facing Windows applications as an urgent patching priority because successful exploitation can progress from sensitive build-data disclosure to remote code execution. First identify Windows-hosted Next.js deployments and their router configuration, then upgrade within an emergency change window. Active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence.
Technical view
Next.js fails to consistently escape backslashes in route segments before creating incremental-cache paths on Windows. Encoded Windows separators can permit traversal beyond the cache root and disclosure of build artifacts, including the server-reference-manifest encryption key. Affected configurations use Pages Router or App Router without Cache Components. Exploitation has high complexity but potentially severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Potentially exposed systems are Windows-hosted Next.js applications running 13.4.0 through 15.5.23, or 16.0.0 through 16.3.2, with Pages Router or App Router without Cache Components. Internet-accessible applications face the clearest remote attack surface. Other platforms and configurations are not identified as affected in the supplied sources.
Exploitation context
The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.0: network-accessible, unauthenticated, no user interaction, high attack complexity, and changed scope. The source bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Key disclosure can enable code execution, but the sources do not describe observed attacks or exploit availability.
Researcher notes
The vulnerable logic is identified in escape-path-delimiters.ts and file-system-cache.ts. The security boundary failure is CWE-22 path traversal caused by inconsistent handling of encoded Windows separators. The reported impact is a chain: traversal, private build-data disclosure, encryption-key exposure, then possible remote code execution. The supplied sources do not provide safe detection indicators or confirm exploit reliability.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade affected 15.x deployments to Next.js 15.5.24 or later.
Upgrade affected 16.x deployments to Next.js 16.3.3 or later.
Prioritize internet-facing Windows deployments using an affected router configuration.
Review the vendor advisory for any additional incident-response or deployment guidance.
Validation and detection
Inventory Next.js versions and confirm whether application servers run on Windows.
Determine whether each application uses Pages Router or App Router without Cache Components.
Confirm deployed versions are at least 15.5.24 or 16.3.3, as applicable.
Review available telemetry for unexpected access to private build or incremental-cache data.
If exposure is suspected, assess possible server-reference-manifest key disclosure using established incident-response procedures.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup
File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-22 · source CWE mapping
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.