Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
AntFlow V2.0.0 reportedly allows unfiltered user input to be evaluated as JUEL expressions, potentially enabling remote command execution. Successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Actual exposure depends on whether the affected test component is deployed and reachable.
Executive priority
Treat confirmed, reachable AntFlow V2.0.0 deployments as an immediate remediation priority. Prioritize internet-facing or unauthenticated instances because the published score indicates full system-impact potential without user interaction.
Technical view
The CVE record identifies CWE-94 in ActivitiTest.java: user-controlled input reaches JUEL expression evaluation without filtering, leading to command execution. CVSS 3.1 rates it 9.8, with network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction specified.
Likely exposure
Potentially exposed organizations are those running AntFlow V2.0.0 with the affected ActivitiTest.java functionality present and network-reachable. The supplied affected-product metadata is incomplete, listing vendor and product as unavailable, so broader version scope cannot be established.
Exploitation context
The supplied record is not marked as CISA KEV, and the bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector describes a remotely reachable, unauthenticated attack path, but deployment prerequisites and real-world reachability are not documented.
Researcher notes
The central claim is unfiltered JUEL expression evaluation in ActivitiTest.java. The record does not provide complete CPE, vendor, fixed-version, deployment-path, or exploitation evidence. Validation should remain non-destructive and focus on code presence, data flow, reachability, and compensating controls.
Mitigation direction
- Identify and isolate AntFlow V2.0.0 deployments containing the affected component.
- Restrict network access to AntFlow interfaces until remediation is confirmed.
- Check project or vendor guidance for a patched release or supported mitigation.
- Avoid exposing test components in production environments.
Validation and detection
- Inventory deployed AntFlow versions and search application artifacts for ActivitiTest.java.
- Determine whether user input can reach the affected JUEL evaluation path.
- Verify affected interfaces require effective network or authentication controls.
- Review relevant application and process logs for unexpected expression evaluation or command execution.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-75414 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 9.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
9.8CriticalVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/Y4y17/CVE/blob/main/AntFlow/Front%20desk%20command%20execution.mdCVE reference, mitre
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.