CVE-2026-75411: JeecgBoot v3.9.2 is vulnerable to Remote command execution.
JeecgBoot v3.9.2 is vulnerable to Remote command execution. The CodeNode component of the AI Flow module supports Groovy script execution. While the `SecurityCheck` class employs a blacklist mechanism to intercept dangerous calls, the dynamic nature of Groovy allows this blacklist to be completely bypassed through string concatenation and reflection.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
JeecgBoot 3.9.2 reportedly allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute commands through the AI Flow module. Successful exploitation could expose data, alter systems, or interrupt services. The issue is critical, but the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation or identify a confirmed fixed version.
Executive priority
Treat internet-accessible or broadly reachable JeecgBoot 3.9.2 systems as an immediate priority. Identify exposure, restrict access, investigate suspicious activity, and obtain vendor-confirmed remediation. Do not assume an upgrade target without published guidance because the supplied sources name no fixed version.
Technical view
The AI Flow CodeNode component executes Groovy scripts. Its SecurityCheck blacklist can reportedly be bypassed using Groovy string concatenation and reflection, resulting in code injection and remote command execution. The CVSS 3.1 vector rates exploitation as network-accessible, low-complexity, unauthenticated, and requiring no user interaction.
Likely exposure
Highest risk applies to JeecgBoot 3.9.2 deployments where the AI Flow CodeNode functionality is enabled and reachable by untrusted users or networks. The supplied CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete, so exposure beyond version 3.9.2 cannot be determined from these sources.
Exploitation context
The issue has a 9.8 CVSS score and a plausible remote, unauthenticated attack path. However, it is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source confirms exploitation in the wild. Public disclosure through the GitHub issue may increase attacker awareness.
Researcher notes
CWE-94 aligns with improper control of dynamically evaluated code. The reported weakness is architectural: a blacklist attempts to secure a highly dynamic Groovy execution environment. The bundle names JeecgBoot 3.9.2, but its structured affected-product fields are recorded as n/a; broader version impact and patch status remain unconfirmed.
Mitigation direction
Inventory JeecgBoot deployments and prioritize any running version 3.9.2.
Check the vendor repository and advisory channels for confirmed remediation guidance or a fixed release.
Restrict untrusted network access to affected JeecgBoot instances while remediation is assessed.
Disable or isolate AI Flow CodeNode functionality if operationally feasible and vendor-supported.
Increase monitoring for unexpected child processes, command execution, and suspicious AI Flow activity.
Validation and detection
Confirm deployed JeecgBoot versions using trusted asset and build records.
Determine whether AI Flow and CodeNode are enabled and accessible to unauthenticated users.
Review application, process, and network logs for anomalous command execution or outbound connections.
Verify network controls prevent untrusted access to affected application paths.
After remediation, confirm the installed release matches published vendor guidance.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.