CVE-2026-75094: COMFAST CF-N1-S CGI mbox-config sub_44B438 os command injection
A flaw has been found in COMFAST CF-N1-S 2.6.0.1. This impacts the function sub_44B438 of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config?method=SET§ion=ptest_ssid of the component CGI Interface. This manipulation of the argument ssid causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
An authenticated attacker could make an affected COMFAST CF-N1-S execute operating-system commands by supplying a malicious Wi-Fi SSID value. Successful exploitation could compromise the device, disrupt service, and affect connected systems. The issue is remotely reachable and rated critical, but the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat confirmed version 2.6.0.1 deployments as urgent, especially when management access crosses untrusted networks. Immediately reduce interface exposure and privileged access, then obtain vendor remediation guidance. Consider isolation or replacement if no supported fix is available. Public exploit material raises urgency, although active exploitation has not been demonstrated by the supplied sources.
Technical view
CVE-2026-75094 affects COMFAST CF-N1-S version 2.6.0.1. The CGI handler sub_44B438 improperly processes the ssid argument at /cgi-bin/mbox-config?method=SET§ion=ptest_ssid, enabling OS command injection. CVSS 4.0 scores it 9.4 with network access, low complexity, high privileges, no user interaction, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to COMFAST CF-N1-S devices running version 2.6.0.1 where the affected CGI interface is reachable. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires high privileges. Internet-accessible or broadly reachable management interfaces increase practical risk; the supplied evidence does not identify other affected versions or products.
Exploitation context
A public exploit repository is referenced, and the CVSS vector marks proof-of-concept maturity as published. Remote exploitation is reportedly possible, but high privileges are required. This CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence confirms exploitation in operational attacks.
Researcher notes
Evidence identifies a specific CGI route, function, and ssid parameter, mapped to CWE-77 and CWE-78. Published exploit material supports practical concern, but this assessment does not validate its reliability. The bundle provides no vendor advisory, fixed version, detection signatures, or confirmed incident evidence, so affected-version scope and remediation remain incomplete.
Mitigation direction
Check COMFAST guidance for fixed firmware or vendor-approved remediation.
Restrict the device management interface to trusted administrative networks.
Block external access to the affected CGI interface where operationally feasible.
Review and minimize accounts holding high administrative privileges.
Isolate affected devices until remediation or replacement is available.
Validation and detection
Inventory CF-N1-S devices and confirm their installed firmware versions.
Verify whether the CGI management interface is reachable from untrusted networks.
Review device logs for unexpected configuration changes or command-execution indicators.
Confirm administrative accounts are necessary, protected, and limited to trusted operators.
After remediation, confirm the affected interface remains restricted and firmware is vendor-approved.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
4 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-77 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.