LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-73842: OpenChoreo: cluster-gateway internal proxy performs no caller authentication and is not read-only — data-plane Secret disclosure and arbitrary Kubernetes mutation

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. Prior to 1.0.3, 1.1.3, and 1.2.0-rc.2, internal/cluster-gateway/server.go exposed /api/proxy/, /api/exec/, and /api/wirelogs/ on an internal listener without requiring a client certificate or token, allowing any network-reachable caller to read tenant Kubernetes Secrets, mutate workloads, and execute commands across connected data planes. This issue is fixed in versions 1.0.3, 1.1.3, and 1.2.0-rc.2.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A missing authentication check in OpenChoreo’s internal cluster gateway lets any caller who can reach it access connected Kubernetes environments. An attacker could steal tenant secrets, alter applications, or run commands, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability across multiple data planes.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent remediation for affected deployments. The vulnerability can expose credentials and permit broad control of connected Kubernetes workloads, creating material operational and data risk. Prioritize externally reachable, shared-network, and multi-tenant environments first, while recognizing that the supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation.

Technical view

Before the fixed releases, the cluster gateway exposed proxy, execution, and wire-log interfaces without client-certificate or token authentication. These interfaces were not read-only, enabling Secret access, workload mutation, and command execution across connected data planes. Affected versions are below 1.0.3, 1.1.0–1.1.2, and 1.2.0-rc.1.

Likely exposure

Exposure requires network reachability to the internal cluster-gateway listener. Risk is highest where untrusted workloads, compromised internal hosts, shared tenant networks, or configuration errors can reach that listener. Internet exposure is not established by the supplied evidence, but internal-only placement does not prevent exploitation by a network-reachable caller.

Exploitation context

The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.0, reflecting low attack complexity and severe cross-scope impact. The supplied record is not in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Public advisory and code-change details may nevertheless help defenders—and potential attackers—identify vulnerable deployments.

Researcher notes

The core weaknesses are missing authentication and authorization on powerful internal interfaces, mapped to CWE-306, CWE-862, and CWE-269. Validation should remain non-destructive: establish version, reachability, authentication enforcement, and audit evidence. The supplied bundle identifies fixes but does not describe observed attacks or confirm whether every deployment topology exposes the listener.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade to OpenChoreo 1.0.3, 1.1.3, 1.2.0-rc.2, or a later supported release.
  • Restrict cluster-gateway listener access to explicitly authorized components until upgrading.
  • Review vendor guidance for branch-specific upgrade and deployment requirements.
  • If compromise is suspected, rotate exposed Kubernetes Secrets and investigate affected workloads.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenChoreo versions and compare them with the documented affected ranges.
  • Confirm the cluster-gateway listener is unreachable from untrusted workloads and network segments.
  • Verify upgraded gateways require the intended client authentication on internal interfaces.
  • Review available cluster-gateway and Kubernetes audit records for unexpected Secret access, mutations, or command execution.
  • Recheck connected data planes for unauthorized workload or configuration changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-306: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-862: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-73842 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
11Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.36GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-73842Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
openchoreoopenchoreo< 1.0.3, >= 1.1.0, < 1.1.3, >= 1.2.0-rc.1, < 1.2.0-rc.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-306 · source CWE mapping

Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality

Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-862 · source CWE mapping

Missing Authorization

Missing Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.