LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-73749: Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities lead to Remote Code Execution in AOS-CX

Multiple vulnerabilities exist in a daemon of AOS-CX that may allow for improper processing of malformed input. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending specially crafted packets to the affected service. Successful exploitation could result in remote code execution with elevated privileges.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Affected HPE AOS-CX network devices may allow an attacker to take control without credentials by sending malicious network packets. Successful exploitation could expose data, alter device operations, or cause outages. The supplied sources do not identify the daemon, affected port, fixed releases, or confirmed exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent network-infrastructure remediation because compromise could grant elevated control without credentials. Prioritize externally or broadly reachable devices, but do not claim active attacks from the available evidence. Obtain HPE's current fixed-release guidance and schedule controlled upgrades promptly.

Technical view

Multiple buffer-overflow vulnerabilities in an unspecified AOS-CX daemon improperly process malformed input. The CVSS 3.1 vector indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. Successful exploitation may execute code with elevated privileges, affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure exists on AOS-CX releases 10.18.0000, 10.17.0000, 10.16.0000, 10.13.0000, and 10.10.0000 when the affected service can receive attacker-controlled packets. The bundle does not specify the daemon, port, default configuration, or whether network segmentation limits reachability.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is remotely reachable and requires neither authentication nor user interaction according to its CVSS vector. The supplied bundle marks it as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation, public proof-of-concept code, or observed attacks.

Researcher notes

The bundle describes multiple buffer overflows but maps CWE-284, an authorization category, without explaining the relationship. It also omits the daemon, protocol, port, crash indicators, affected hardware, fixed versions, and root-cause detail. Safe validation should therefore focus on inventory, reachability, telemetry, and vendor-confirmed remediation rather than active malformed-packet testing.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory AOS-CX devices and compare installed releases with the reported affected versions.
  • Review HPE advisory hpesbnw05134en_us for fixed releases and vendor-approved mitigations.
  • Apply the vendor-provided fixed release using established network-device change controls.
  • Restrict untrusted access to affected devices and services where operationally safe.
  • Increase monitoring until every affected or potentially affected device is remediated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each device model, AOS-CX version, and exposure path in the asset inventory.
  • Identify the implicated daemon and port from current HPE guidance before testing reachability.
  • Verify installed versions after maintenance against HPE's documented fixed-release guidance.
  • Review available network and device telemetry for unusual traffic or crashes affecting the service.
  • Reassess segmentation and access controls from each relevant untrusted network zone.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-73749 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9hpe

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-73749Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)AOS-CX10.18.0000, 10.17.0000, 10.16.0000, 10.13.0000, 10.10.0000affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.