LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-73570: A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional...

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user.

HighCVSS 8.9Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Internet-facing Zimbra mail servers may allow an unauthenticated attacker to run operating-system commands. Exposure requires a version before 10.1.20, the optional zimbra-snmp package, and enabled SNMP notifications. Because exploitation is reported and CISA lists the CVE as known exploited, affected organizations should respond immediately.

Executive priority

Immediate. Identify affected mail servers, remediate them urgently, and investigate exposed systems for compromise. Active exploitation materially increases business risk, including mailbox data theft, system manipulation, and service disruption. Systems lacking the optional package or enabled notifications should still be documented as not presently exposed.

Technical view

Improper sanitization during SNMP notification processing permits command injection through specially crafted SMTP requests. Successful exploitation executes commands as the Zimbra user without authentication or user interaction. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.9, with high confidentiality and integrity impact and limited availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Zimbra Collaboration before 10.1.20 where zimbra-snmp is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Internet-reachable SMTP services meeting all three conditions are the highest concern. The supplied affected-version metadata is inconsistent, so organizations should confirm applicability through Zimbra guidance and direct configuration inventory.

Exploitation context

Active exploitation is supported by the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities designation and the supplied CERT Polska advisory. The bundle does not describe campaign scale, attacker identity, indicators of compromise, or exploitation reliability. The CVSS vector records high attack complexity, but exploitation requires neither authentication nor user interaction.

Researcher notes

This is CWE-78 command injection with conditional exposure. The supplied record identifies the vulnerable boundary as versions before 10.1.20, but its structured affected entry lists version "0" with default status unaffected, creating ambiguity. Validate product applicability against current Zimbra advisories. No exploit mechanics, indicators, or campaign details are provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Zimbra Collaboration deployments to version 10.1.20 or later, following vendor guidance.
  • If immediate upgrading is impossible, disable SNMP notifications or remove zimbra-snmp after assessing operational dependencies.
  • Restrict unnecessary SMTP exposure while preserving required mail delivery.
  • Review Zimbra security advisories for additional remediation or compromise-assessment guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Zimbra versions and identify every deployment earlier than 10.1.20.
  • Confirm whether zimbra-snmp is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled.
  • Prioritize investigation of internet-reachable SMTP services meeting all exposure conditions.
  • Review relevant system and mail activity for unexpected commands or processes executed as the Zimbra user.
  • After remediation, confirm the installed version and verify unnecessary SNMP notification functionality remains disabled.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-73570 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
4Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA-ADP
Date added
KEV reference

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: activeAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.9CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L2.26mitre

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.9High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-73570Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. Added to KEVCISA-ADP

    CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities metadata lists this CVE as known exploited.

  4. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvcother:kev
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ZimbraCollaboration0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.