LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-73483: Flowise before 3.1.3 Sandbox Escape via Puppeteer

Flowise (packages flowise and flowise-components) in versions <= 3.1.2 contain a sandbox escape in the vm2/@flowiseai/nodevm JavaScript sandbox. An authenticated user with access to the /api/v1/node-custom-function endpoint can escape the sandbox by supplying attacker-controlled executablePath and args parameters to puppeteer.launch(), which internally invokes child_process.spawn() outside the sandbox boundary. This allows execution of arbitrary OS commands as the Flowise process user (root in the official Docker image) and arbitrary host file disclosure via Chromium's file:// URL handling. In versions 3.0.8–3.1.2 exploitation requires ALLOW_BUILTIN_DEP=true; earlier versions are exploitable by default. Fixed in 3.1.3.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Authenticated Flowise users may turn custom JavaScript functions into operating-system commands, escaping the intended sandbox. Successful compromise can expose or alter sensitive data and disrupt the service. Impact is especially severe when Flowise runs as root, as identified for the official Docker image.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate remediation priority where affected Flowise deployments permit custom functions. Prioritize root-running containers, exposed services, sensitive host mounts, and environments with multiple or less-trusted authenticated users. Upgrade promptly and investigate suspicious activity; widespread active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence.

Technical view

Flowise and flowise-components through 3.1.2 permit a vm2/@flowiseai/nodevm sandbox escape through the custom-function API. Attacker-controlled Puppeteer launch parameters reach child_process.spawn outside the sandbox, enabling commands as the Flowise process user and host-file disclosure through Chromium file URLs. Versions 3.0.8–3.1.2 require ALLOW_BUILTIN_DEP=true; earlier affected versions are exploitable by default.

Likely exposure

Exposure requires an authenticated account able to access /api/v1/node-custom-function. Risk is highest for internet-accessible deployments, untrusted or compromised users, ALLOW_BUILTIN_DEP=true, sensitive host mounts, or execution as root. The supplied evidence does not quantify deployment prevalence.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability has low stated attack complexity and requires no user interaction, but does require privileges. It is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and the cited information does not establish active exploitation in the wild. Public advisories describe the underlying escape mechanism.

Researcher notes

The trust-boundary failure occurs when sandbox-controlled Puppeteer options cause process creation outside vm2/@flowiseai/nodevm. Potential impact spans host confidentiality, integrity, and availability under the Flowise account. Exact pre-3.0.8 configuration conditions and indicators of compromise are not fully detailed in the supplied bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Flowise and flowise-components to version 3.1.3 or later.
  • Restrict custom-function API access to trusted administrators until upgrading.
  • Disable ALLOW_BUILTIN_DEP where operationally possible, particularly on versions 3.0.8–3.1.2.
  • Avoid running Flowise as root and minimize accessible host files and mounts.
  • Review the vendor advisory for any additional deployment-specific guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Flowise and flowise-components versions; identify deployments running 3.1.2 or earlier.
  • Confirm whether users can access /api/v1/node-custom-function.
  • Check whether ALLOW_BUILTIN_DEP is enabled on versions 3.0.8–3.1.2.
  • Determine the Flowise process user and whether official Docker deployments run as root.
  • Review authentication, API, process, and file-access logs for suspicious custom-function activity.
  • Verify the installed version reports 3.1.3 or later after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-73483 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-73483Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FlowiseAIFlowise0, 3.1.3unaffected
FlowiseAIFlowise0, 3.1.3unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.