CVE-2026-73251: Mongoose Built-in TLS: CA-bundle certificate chain accepted without any signature verification
Mongoose is an embedded web server and network library. Prior to 7.23, a network attacker can impersonate a TLS server to a Mongoose client configured with a multi-certificate CA bundle. In src/tls_builtin.c, the mg_tls_init() function stores the bundle in tls->ca_bundle_der while tls->ca_der.len remains zero, and mg_tls_recv_cert() uses tls_bundle_find() to accept a Common Name match without calling mg_tls_verify_cert_signature(). A forged self-signed certificate can therefore satisfy hostname and CertificateVerify checks and enable interception, credential disclosure, traffic modification, and malicious responses. This issue is fixed in version 7.23.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Affected Mongoose clients may trust an impostor TLS server when using a multi-certificate CA bundle. An unauthenticated network attacker could intercept connections, expose credentials, alter traffic, or return malicious content. The defect affects versions before 7.23 and is fixed in 7.23.
Executive priority
Treat as an urgent remediation for confirmed affected clients, especially embedded systems handling credentials, updates, control traffic, or sensitive data. Rapidly determine whether the specific multi-certificate CA-bundle configuration is present, then upgrade and redeploy. Systems without that configuration should remain tracked until their non-exposure is documented.
Technical view
In Mongoose’s built-in TLS implementation, multi-certificate bundles are stored separately while the single-CA field remains empty. Certificate processing can then accept a Common Name match from the bundle without verifying the certificate signature. This breaks server authentication and permits a forged self-signed certificate to pass relevant checks.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to applications or embedded products using Mongoose before 7.23 as a TLS client with a multi-certificate CA bundle. Mongoose servers, clients using a single CA certificate, or deployments using another TLS implementation are not established as affected by the supplied evidence.
Exploitation context
The vulnerability is network-reachable, requires no privileges or user interaction, and has low stated attack complexity. The source bundle does not report known active exploitation and marks KEV false. Practical risk is highest where attackers can influence network traffic between an affected client and its intended server.
Researcher notes
The failure is CWE-295 improper certificate validation. The supplied description ties the bypass to mg_tls_init(), mg_tls_recv_cert(), tls_bundle_find(), and the omitted mg_tls_verify_cert_signature() call. Review downstream forks and vendored copies because application package versions may not reveal the embedded Mongoose revision.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade Mongoose to version 7.23 or later.
Rebuild and redeploy every application or firmware image containing the affected library.
Prioritize clients carrying credentials, administrative traffic, updates, or safety-sensitive commands.
Check the vendor advisory before relying on configuration changes as temporary mitigation.
Validation and detection
Inventory applications and firmware containing Mongoose, including statically linked copies.
Confirm the deployed Mongoose version from build records or production artifacts.
Identify clients using built-in TLS with multi-certificate CA bundles.
Verify rebuilt artifacts contain version 7.23 or later.
Test that clients reject certificates lacking a valid chain to the configured trust store.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-295 · source CWE mapping
Improper Certificate Validation
Improper Certificate Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.