CVE-2026-72830: Grav API Plugin before 1.0.13 RCE via ConfigController scope bypass
Grav API plugin versions before 1.0.13 fail to enforce API key scope caps in ConfigController super-scope gates, allowing scoped keys to write scheduler configuration. Attackers with a scoped api.config.write key can inject arbitrary commands into scheduler.custom_jobs that execute via Symfony Process for remote code execution.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A permissions flaw in the Grav API Plugin before version 1.0.13 can let a scoped API key alter scheduled jobs and cause attacker-controlled commands to run on the server. Successful exploitation could compromise data, website integrity, and availability. The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.
Executive priority
Prioritize immediate inventory and remediation of reachable installations. Systems running a pre-1.0.13 API Plugin with configuration-capable scoped keys warrant urgent containment and investigation because successful exploitation provides server-level command execution. Do not infer compromise solely from vulnerability presence.
Technical view
ConfigController does not correctly enforce API-key scope caps at super-scope authorization gates. A key with api.config.write can modify scheduler.custom_jobs, whose commands are executed through Symfony Process, resulting in remote code execution. The supplied CVSS is 9.8, although the stated scoped-key requirement appears inconsistent with its PR:N vector.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where the Grav API Plugin is installed below 1.0.13, its API is reachable, and scoped API keys can access configuration-writing functionality. The bundle does not establish whether the plugin is enabled by default or quantify internet exposure.
Exploitation context
No CISA KEV listing is indicated, and the supplied sources provide no evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation nevertheless has a severe outcome because scheduler configuration can reach an operating-system process execution path. Treat unexpected scheduler changes or API-key use as potentially significant.
Researcher notes
CWE-269 fits the authorization-capability bypass described. Important evidence gaps include deployment prevalence, default API exposure, public exploit availability, and observed attacks. The bundle also presents a potential scoring inconsistency: exploitation requires a scoped api.config.write key, while the CVSS vector states PR:N. Validate this distinction against the vendor advisory.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade the Grav API Plugin to version 1.0.13 or later.
Restrict API access until upgrading, especially configuration-writing endpoints.
Rotate scoped API keys that may have been exposed or misused.
Review vendor guidance for any additional release-specific remediation.
Validation and detection
Inventory Grav installations and identify the installed API Plugin version.
Confirm all API Plugin installations are version 1.0.13 or later.
Review scheduler.custom_jobs for unauthorized or unexplained entries.
Audit configuration-writing API activity and scoped-key usage for anomalies.
Check host and application telemetry for processes associated with suspicious scheduler entries.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup
Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-269 · source CWE mapping
Improper Privilege Management
Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.