LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-72830: Grav API Plugin before 1.0.13 RCE via ConfigController scope bypass

Grav API plugin versions before 1.0.13 fail to enforce API key scope caps in ConfigController super-scope gates, allowing scoped keys to write scheduler configuration. Attackers with a scoped api.config.write key can inject arbitrary commands into scheduler.custom_jobs that execute via Symfony Process for remote code execution.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A permissions flaw in the Grav API Plugin before version 1.0.13 can let a scoped API key alter scheduled jobs and cause attacker-controlled commands to run on the server. Successful exploitation could compromise data, website integrity, and availability. The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediate inventory and remediation of reachable installations. Systems running a pre-1.0.13 API Plugin with configuration-capable scoped keys warrant urgent containment and investigation because successful exploitation provides server-level command execution. Do not infer compromise solely from vulnerability presence.

Technical view

ConfigController does not correctly enforce API-key scope caps at super-scope authorization gates. A key with api.config.write can modify scheduler.custom_jobs, whose commands are executed through Symfony Process, resulting in remote code execution. The supplied CVSS is 9.8, although the stated scoped-key requirement appears inconsistent with its PR:N vector.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where the Grav API Plugin is installed below 1.0.13, its API is reachable, and scoped API keys can access configuration-writing functionality. The bundle does not establish whether the plugin is enabled by default or quantify internet exposure.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing is indicated, and the supplied sources provide no evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation nevertheless has a severe outcome because scheduler configuration can reach an operating-system process execution path. Treat unexpected scheduler changes or API-key use as potentially significant.

Researcher notes

CWE-269 fits the authorization-capability bypass described. Important evidence gaps include deployment prevalence, default API exposure, public exploit availability, and observed attacks. The bundle also presents a potential scoring inconsistency: exploitation requires a scoped api.config.write key, while the CVSS vector states PR:N. Validate this distinction against the vendor advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade the Grav API Plugin to version 1.0.13 or later.
  • Restrict API access until upgrading, especially configuration-writing endpoints.
  • Rotate scoped API keys that may have been exposed or misused.
  • Review vendor guidance for any additional release-specific remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Grav installations and identify the installed API Plugin version.
  • Confirm all API Plugin installations are version 1.0.13 or later.
  • Review scheduler.custom_jobs for unauthorized or unexplained entries.
  • Audit configuration-writing API activity and scoped-key usage for anomalies.
  • Check host and application telemetry for processes associated with suspicious scheduler entries.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-72830 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-72830Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
getgravgrav0, 1.0.13unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.