LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-72508: Multicloud-operators-subscription: multicloud-operators-subscription: hub and spoke serviceaccounts bound to wildcard rbac (*/*/*)

A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows a namespace-admin tenant to perform a confused-deputy attack by creating Subscription Custom Resources (CRs) that leverage a highly privileged ServiceAccount (SA). This enables the tenant to deploy arbitrary cluster-scoped resources, leading to privilege escalation and potential arbitrary code execution across the cluster.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A namespace administrator in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management can misuse a subscription service account with excessive permissions. This can turn limited tenant access into control over cluster-wide resources, potentially compromising applications, data, and cluster availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent privileged-access issue. Rapidly identify RHACM 2 environments, especially multi-tenant clusters, restrict the vulnerable workflow where feasible, and follow Red Hat remediation guidance. Potential impact spans confidentiality, integrity, and availability across the cluster.

Technical view

The multicloud-operators-subscription component permits a namespace admin to create Subscription custom resources that invoke a highly privileged service account. Wildcard RBAC allows cluster-scoped resource deployment, creating a confused-deputy privilege escalation path and potential arbitrary code execution. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 9.9 with changed security scope.

Likely exposure

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 deployments using rhacm2/multicluster-operators-subscription-rhel9 may be exposed. The supplied sources do not identify affected or fixed version boundaries, so product presence and vendor guidance must determine exposure.

Exploitation context

Exploitation requires low-privileged namespace-admin access but no user interaction, according to the supplied CVSS vector. No supplied source reports active exploitation, and the bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV. That does not prove exploitation is not occurring.

Researcher notes

This is a CWE-250 excessive-privilege and confused-deputy condition. Investigation should correlate Subscription custom resources, initiating namespace-admin identities, controller activity, privileged service-account use, and resulting cluster-scoped objects. Exact affected versions, patches, and exploitation telemetry are not provided in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat guidance for affected versions, updates, and supported mitigations.
  • Restrict untrusted namespace administrators from creating or modifying Subscription custom resources until remediated.
  • Review and reduce wildcard RBAC permissions assigned to subscription service accounts.
  • Prioritize hub and spoke clusters hosting sensitive workloads or multiple tenants.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory RHACM 2 installations and the multicluster-operators-subscription-rhel9 package.
  • Identify subscription service accounts bound to wildcard RBAC permissions.
  • Audit recent Subscription custom-resource creation or changes by namespace administrators.
  • Review cluster-scoped resources created through subscription-related service accounts.
  • Confirm vendor-prescribed remediation is applied across hub and spoke clusters.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-250: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-72508 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-72508Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2rhacm2/multicluster-operators-subscription-rhel9affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-250 · source CWE mapping

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.