LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-71957: D-Link DWR-M961 Buffer Overflow via app.cgi

D-Link DWR-M961 devices with hardware version C1 and software version 1.1.2_C1_202602110044 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the app.cgi interface. A remote attacker can write an overly long string to the netAcc.addlist[].name field and execute arbitrary commands by crafting a specific payload, or cause the device to crash.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A critical flaw in specific D-Link DWR-M961 routers could let an unauthenticated remote attacker take control of the device or crash it. Confirmed scope is hardware revision C1 running software 1.1.2_C1_202602110044. Compromise could expose traffic, alter network behavior, or interrupt connectivity.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediate identification and containment of affected, remotely reachable routers. Apply D-Link's supported remediation as soon as confirmed. Where remediation is unavailable, isolate or replace the device because successful exploitation could enable full router compromise and business connectivity disruption.

Technical view

CVE-2026-71957 is a CWE-120 buffer overflow in the app.cgi interface. An oversized netAcc.addlist[].name value can cause arbitrary command execution or denial of service. CVSS 3.1 rates it 9.8: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest where an affected router's app.cgi management interface is reachable from untrusted networks. Devices limited to trusted administrative networks have reduced reachability but remain vulnerable to attackers with network access. The supplied evidence confirms only DWR-M961 hardware C1 with software 1.1.2_C1_202602110044.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not identify this CVE as CISA KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. It does establish unauthenticated remote command execution and device-crash potential. Treat reachable affected devices urgently without claiming exploitation has occurred.

Researcher notes

The reported sink is netAcc.addlist[].name within app.cgi, with outcomes including command execution and crash. The bundle does not provide fixed-version details, observed exploitation, or complete interface exposure requirements. Validate defensively using inventory, configuration, reachability, logs, and vendor guidance; avoid production crash testing.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory DWR-M961 routers and identify hardware revision and installed software version.
  • Follow D-Link SAP10512 for applicable firmware or remediation; the supplied sources do not name a fixed version.
  • Disable WAN-facing management access where enabled.
  • Restrict administration interfaces to trusted management networks and authorized hosts.
  • Isolate or replace affected devices that cannot receive vendor-supported remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each device is DWR-M961 hardware C1 and record its exact software version.
  • Verify whether app.cgi is reachable from WAN, guest, user, or other untrusted network segments.
  • After remediation, confirm the installed version matches D-Link's advisory guidance.
  • Review device logs for unexplained crashes, restarts, configuration changes, or administrative activity.
  • Recheck network controls to ensure management access is limited to approved sources.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-71957 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-71957Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
D-Link CorporationDWR-M9610affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.