LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-71946: D-Link DWR-M961 Command Injection via /boafrm/formPingDiagnosticRun

D-Link DWR-M961 devices with hardware version C1 and firmware version before 1.1.5_C1_202607071108 contain a command injection vulnerability in the /boafrm/formPingDiagnosticRun interface. A remote attacker can inject arbitrary malicious commands into the host field, resulting in command execution with root privileges.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A vulnerable D-Link DWR-M961 router could let an unauthenticated remote attacker run commands as root through its ping-diagnostic function. Successful exploitation could expose traffic and credentials, change router settings, disrupt connectivity, or compromise connected networks.

Executive priority

Treat affected, reachable devices as an immediate remediation priority. Identify C1 units, restrict interface exposure, and deploy the vendor firmware promptly. Devices controlling important sites or carrying sensitive traffic should be handled first.

Technical view

CVE-2026-71946 is a CWE-78 command-injection flaw in /boafrm/formPingDiagnosticRun. The host field reportedly accepts injected operating-system commands. It affects DWR-M961 hardware revision C1 running firmware earlier than 1.1.5_C1_202607071108 and can provide root-level execution without authentication or user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to DWR-M961 hardware revision C1 with affected firmware. Risk is highest where the vulnerable web interface is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The bundle does not establish whether factory-default configurations expose this interface externally.

Exploitation context

The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 because exploitation is network-based, low complexity, unauthenticated, and requires no user interaction. The supplied record is not marked as CISA KEV, and the sources provided do not establish active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The affected request handler and input field are identified, but the bundle does not document authentication configuration, default interface exposure, indicators of compromise, or verified exploitation activity. Validation should remain non-destructive and focus on model, hardware, firmware, reachability, and logs.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory DWR-M961 devices and confirm each device's hardware revision and installed firmware.
  • Upgrade C1 devices to 1.1.5_C1_202607071108 or a later vendor-approved release.
  • Until upgraded, prevent the management and diagnostic interface from being reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review the D-Link advisory for installation instructions, prerequisites, and any additional mitigations.

Validation and detection

  • Verify the device label or management interface identifies hardware revision C1.
  • Confirm the installed firmware is 1.1.5_C1_202607071108 or later.
  • Test externally that management and diagnostic interfaces are inaccessible from untrusted networks.
  • Review router and network logs for unexpected diagnostic requests, configuration changes, or outbound connections.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-71946 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-71946Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
D-Link CorporationDWR-M9610affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.