LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-70553: MaxSite CMS Unauthenticated RCE via Install Endpoint

MaxSite CMS contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary PHP code into the application configuration file by submitting crafted POST requests to the install endpoint after installation is complete. Attackers can supply a malicious db_dbprefix value containing a single quote to break out of a PHP string literal in application/config/database.php, appending attacker-controlled PHP statements that are executed by the web server on every subsequent request, resulting in persistent unauthenticated remote code execution as the web-server process user.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

MaxSite CMS installations may allow anyone on the internet to place malicious PHP into a configuration file through the installation endpoint. The injected code then runs on later requests with web-server privileges, enabling persistent server compromise without authentication or user interaction.

Executive priority

Treat internet-facing instances as an immediate remediation priority because exploitation requires no account or user action and can produce persistent server-side code execution. Confirm exposure, restrict the installation endpoint, and obtain authoritative vendor correction guidance promptly.

Technical view

Crafted POST data can inject PHP through the db_dbprefix field by escaping a string literal written to application/config/database.php. Subsequent web requests execute the appended code. The supplied record rates this CVSS 9.8 and identifies CWE-94, with MaxSite CMS 105.2 and 109.6 listed as affected.

Likely exposure

Internet-facing MaxSite CMS 105.2 or 109.6 systems are potentially exposed when the installation endpoint remains reachable and can rewrite application/config/database.php after installation. The bundle does not establish whether every deployment exposes this endpoint by default or requires specific filesystem permissions.

Exploitation context

The attack is remotely reachable, low complexity, unauthenticated, and requires no user interaction. Successful exploitation could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The supplied record is not in KEV, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The bundle lists versions 105.2 and 109.6 as affected, while a reference labeled “Patch Commit” points to a 109.6 page. This ambiguity prevents identifying a safe fixed version from the supplied evidence. Validation should focus on endpoint reachability, configuration-file integrity, and web-server write access.

Mitigation direction

  • Consult MaxSite guidance and apply a confirmed corrected release; the bundle does not identify an unambiguous fixed version.
  • Until corrected, prevent untrusted access to the installation endpoint using server or network controls.
  • Restrict web-server write permissions for configuration files where operationally feasible.
  • If compromise is suspected, isolate the host and restore configuration and application files from trusted sources.
  • Rotate database credentials and other secrets accessible to the web-server process after suspected compromise.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory MaxSite CMS deployments and verify installed versions.
  • Determine whether the installation endpoint remains publicly reachable after deployment.
  • Check application/config/database.php for unexpected PHP statements or recent unauthorized changes.
  • Review HTTP logs for anomalous POST requests targeting the installation endpoint.
  • Assess related files, processes, and credentials if configuration tampering is found.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-70553 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-70553Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MaxSiteMaxSite CMS105.2, 109.6affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.