LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-69259: Flowise RCE via SQLite Record Manager Node

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, the SQLite Record Manager node in packages/components/nodes/recordmanager/SQLiteRecordManager/SQLiteRecordManager.ts accepted user-controlled additionalConfig and spread it after the intended database setting, allowing additionalConfig.database to overwrite the SQLite database path. An authenticated attacker using the published Docker image, which ran as root, could write a SQLite database to paths such as /etc/chromium/exploit.conf; by controlling the table name and namespace value, the attacker could place shell syntax into the database file and trigger execution when Puppeteer launched Chromium and sourced /etc/chromium/*.conf. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated Flowise user could abuse the SQLite Record Manager node to write attacker-controlled data outside its intended location. In affected Docker deployments running as root, this could lead to operating-system command execution and complete compromise of the service, its data, and connected resources.

Executive priority

Treat affected, root-running Docker deployments as an emergency upgrade, especially when workflow-building interfaces are externally reachable. Successful exploitation could provide full service and host compromise. Other affected installations still warrant expedited remediation because authenticated access is the principal stated prerequisite.

Technical view

Before 3.1.3, user-controlled additionalConfig could override the intended SQLite database path. With the published root-running Docker image, an authenticated attacker could place crafted database content where Chromium configuration files were loaded, resulting in code execution when Puppeteer launched Chromium. The issue is classified as CWE-94 with CVSS 4.0 score 9.4.

Likely exposure

Flowise versions earlier than 3.1.3 are affected. Risk is greatest where authenticated users can create or modify flows using SQLite Record Manager and the published Docker image runs as root. The supplied evidence does not establish exposure for installations using different runtime permissions or configurations.

Exploitation context

Exploitation requires authenticated access but no user interaction, and the supplied CVSS vector rates attack complexity as low. The source bundle reports no CISA KEV listing and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Absence from KEV does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

Researcher notes

The vulnerable merge order allowed additionalConfig.database to replace the intended path. The demonstrated impact depends on filesystem permissions, attacker-controlled record content, and Chromium loading configuration from the written location. The supplied sources establish a fix in 3.1.3 but do not provide evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade every affected Flowise deployment to version 3.1.3 or later.
  • Prioritize affected deployments using the published Docker image or running Flowise as root.
  • Until upgraded, restrict flow-building access and follow any additional Flowise vendor guidance.
  • Isolate potentially compromised instances and apply established incident-response procedures.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Flowise deployments and confirm each installed version.
  • Identify deployments using the published Docker image and determine their runtime user privileges.
  • Review access controls for users able to create or modify Flowise workflows.
  • Check affected hosts for unexpected filesystem writes or suspicious Chromium and Puppeteer activity.
  • Confirm version 3.1.3 or later after remediation and retest normal workflow operation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-69259 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HGitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-69259Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FlowiseAIFlowise< 3.1.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.