LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-69253: Flowise Sandbox Escape to RCE

Flowise is a drag-and-drop user interface for building customized large language model (LLM) flows. Prior to version 3.1.3, several custom-tool components — AgentAsTool, ChatflowTool, and ExecuteFlow — ran code in the in-process  vm2  sandbox. To build that code, they inserted a user-controlled  baseURL  value straight into the JavaScript source, for example  const url = "${baseURL}/..."; . The only check on  baseURL  was  isValidURL , but a valid-looking URL can still contain characters that break out of a code string. An authenticated user could craft a  baseURL  that passed this check, closed the surrounding string, and injected their own JavaScript into the sandboxed script (code injection, CWE-94). The  vm2  sandbox runs in the same Node.js process as Flowise and exposes risky dependencies. As a result, the injected code could escape the sandbox and run arbitrary code on the Flowise server as the Flowise process user. Exploitation only requires an authenticated session. The issue is fixed in version 3.1.3, which passes the URL to the sandbox as data instead of inserting it into code and adds stricter URL validation.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated Flowise user can turn a crafted URL value into code execution on servers running versions before 3.1.3. Successful exploitation could expose or alter data and disrupt both Flowise and connected systems accessible to its service account.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent upgrade for affected installations. Authenticated access lowers exposure compared with an unauthenticated flaw, but successful exploitation could compromise the server and connected resources. Prioritize shared, externally reachable, or highly privileged Flowise deployments.

Technical view

AgentAsTool, ChatflowTool, and ExecuteFlow inserted user-controlled baseURL values into JavaScript executed by in-process vm2. A crafted value could escape the generated string, inject code, escape the sandbox through exposed dependencies, and execute as the Flowise process user. Version 3.1.3 passes the URL as data and strengthens validation.

Likely exposure

Flowise deployments earlier than 3.1.3 are affected when authenticated users can access the vulnerable custom-tool components. Internet-facing or broadly shared instances warrant particular attention, although the supplied sources do not quantify deployment exposure.

Exploitation context

Exploitation requires an authenticated session and is rated high complexity in the supplied CVSS 4.0 vector. The sources describe remote server compromise potential, but provide no evidence of active exploitation; the CVE is not identified as being in KEV.

Researcher notes

The vulnerable pattern is source construction from untrusted baseURL data before vm2 execution. The bundle describes code injection and sandbox escape, while its structured CWE field lists CWE-95. Assess both injection reachability and the privileges available to the Flowise process. No public exploitation evidence is supplied.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Flowise to version 3.1.3 or later.
  • Restrict authenticated access until upgrading, especially access to custom-tool and flow-building functionality.
  • Review Flowise service-account permissions and reduce unnecessary access to secrets, files, networks, and connected systems.
  • Follow the Flowise advisory and release guidance for deployment-specific precautions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm every Flowise instance reports version 3.1.3 or later.
  • Inventory instances where authenticated users can create or execute the affected custom-tool components.
  • Review authentication, flow-change, and server logs for unexpected activity involving affected components or unusual URL values.
  • Verify the Flowise process runs with minimal filesystem, network, and credential access after upgrading.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-95: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-69253 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HGitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-69253Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FlowiseAIFlowise< 3.1.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-95 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.