LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-68558: Wekan: SSRF filter bypass via DNS-resolving hostname in outgoing webhooks (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-53446)

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. From 8.36 until 9.74, the outgoing webhook Integration URL validator in models/integrations.js checked only the literal URL.hostname against regular expressions, so DNS names such as 169-254-169-254.nip.io passed that first-line check. The delivery path's fetchSafe guard already blocked the reported IPv4 destination, but its separate IPv4-only resolver and duplicated blocklist created inconsistent all-address-family enforcement and drift risk between input-time and connection-time validation. Version 9.74 makes server/lib/ssrfGuard.js resolve all addresses with `dns.lookup({ all: true })`, validate every result through the shared isIpBlocked logic, pin the connection, and block redirects. This issue is fixed in version 9.74.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Wekan’s outgoing webhook checks could accept a DNS hostname that resolves to a normally blocked internal address. This creates a server-side request forgery risk for Wekan 8.36 through 9.73. The reported IPv4 destination was already blocked during delivery, but inconsistent validation left broader bypass and maintenance risk. Wekan 9.74 fixes the issue.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority upgrade, particularly where users can configure integrations and Wekan reaches internal systems. Although active exploitation is not evidenced, the potential confidentiality impact is high and the fix is available. Confirm deployment coverage and inspect existing webhook destinations promptly.

Technical view

The Integration URL validator compared only the literal hostname against regular expressions. DNS-resolving hostnames could therefore pass initial validation. Connection-time protection used separate IPv4-only resolution and a duplicated blocklist. Version 9.74 centralizes IP blocking, validates every resolved IPv4 and IPv6 address, pins the connection, and blocks redirects.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Wekan versions 8.36 through 9.73 where a user can configure outgoing webhook Integration URLs. Risk is greatest where the Wekan server can reach sensitive internal services or network metadata endpoints. The supplied sources do not establish that every accepted hostname results in a successful internal request.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, required low privileges, no user interaction, and potentially high confidentiality impact. The supplied record is not in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. It describes a bypass pattern and an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-53446.

Researcher notes

This is CWE-918 and an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-53446. The central issue is validation inconsistency: literal-hostname filtering at input time versus separate IPv4-only resolution at connection time. The 9.74 change resolves all addresses, applies shared blocking logic, pins connections, and disables redirects, reducing DNS rebinding, IPv6, and policy-drift risk.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Wekan to version 9.74 or later.
  • Prioritize internet-facing deployments and servers with access to sensitive internal networks.
  • Review and remove untrusted outgoing webhook Integration URLs.
  • Consult the Wekan security advisory if an immediate upgrade is impossible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm every Wekan deployment reports version 9.74 or later.
  • Inventory outgoing webhook integrations and identify DNS-based destination hostnames.
  • Verify the deployed code uses the shared SSRF guard introduced by the referenced fix.
  • Confirm resolved IPv4 and IPv6 destinations are validated and redirects are blocked.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-68558 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N3.14.7GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-68558Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
wekanwekan>= 8.36, < 9.74Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.