LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-6846: Binutils: binutils: arbitrary code execution via malformed xcoff object file processing

A flaw was found in binutils. A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists when processing a specially crafted XCOFF (Extended Common Object File Format) object file during linking. A local attacker could trick a user into processing this malicious file, which could lead to arbitrary code execution, allowing the attacker to run unauthorized commands, or cause a denial of service, making the system unavailable.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a high-severity file-processing flaw in Red Hat-packaged binutils-related components. A malicious XCOFF object file could cause code execution or denial of service if someone links or processes it. It is not remotely exploitable by itself; it needs local file processing and user interaction.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for build and developer environments, especially where untrusted artifacts enter pipelines. It is not presented as actively exploited or network-reachable, so prioritize exposed processing workflows over broad emergency response.

Technical view

CVE-2026-6846 is a heap-buffer-overflow, CWE-122, in XCOFF object handling during linking. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 7.8 with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Most exposed systems are developer, build, CI, packaging, or analysis environments that process untrusted object files. The supplied Red Hat data marks specific Hardened Images binutils-main versions, RHEL 10 mingw-binutils, and RHEL 8 gdb and mingw-binutils as affected.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Practical abuse requires convincing a user or workflow to process a crafted XCOFF object file. That lowers wormability, but build systems and automated artifact processing can still create meaningful risk.

Researcher notes

Evidence is Red Hat-centered. The bundle identifies affected and unaffected Red Hat packages but does not include exploit proof, KEV status, or detailed fixed-version text. Avoid assuming all binutils deployments are affected without vendor-specific confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply applicable Red Hat errata where available for affected packages.
  • Check Red Hat CVE and CSAF VEX entries for current package status.
  • Restrict processing of untrusted XCOFF or object files in build workflows.
  • Run file-analysis and linking jobs with least privilege and isolation.
  • Prioritize affected CI, developer, and artifact-ingestion systems.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed binutils, mingw-binutils, gdb, and binutils-main packages.
  • Compare package status against the Red Hat CVE and CSAF VEX data.
  • Identify workflows that link or inspect externally supplied object files.
  • Confirm relevant RHSA advisories are applied where applicable.
  • Document unaffected Red Hat products separately to avoid unnecessary remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-6846 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9redhat
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-6846Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  4. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  5. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  6. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  7. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPbinutils: Binutils: Arbitrary code execution via malformed XCOFF object file processing
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesbinutils-main, 2.45.1-5.1.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesbinutils-main, 2.46.1-1.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gcc-toolset-15-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-14-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-14-gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-15-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-15-gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gcc-toolset-14-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gcc-toolset-15-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.