LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-6846: Binutils: binutils: arbitrary code execution via malformed xcoff object file processing

A flaw was found in binutils. A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists when processing a specially crafted XCOFF (Extended Common Object File Format) object file during linking. A local attacker could trick a user into processing this malicious file, which could lead to arbitrary code execution, allowing the attacker to run unauthorized commands, or cause a denial of service, making the system unavailable.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A malicious XCOFF object file can corrupt memory when processed by affected Binutils-related tooling. An attacker must persuade a user or automated build process to handle the file. Successful exploitation could run unauthorized commands with that process’s permissions or interrupt service.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation in CI, developer, and malware-analysis systems handling outside artifacts. The vulnerability has high potential impact but requires local file processing and user or workflow interaction. Accelerate action where untrusted objects are routinely processed; otherwise handle through the urgent patch cycle.

Technical view

CVE-2026-6846 is a CWE-122 heap-buffer overflow triggered while linking a specially crafted XCOFF object file. It is rated CVSS 3.1 7.8: local access, low complexity, no prior privileges, and user interaction required, with potentially high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Confirmed affected Red Hat entries include specific Hardened Images binutils-main releases, RHEL 8 gdb and mingw-binutils, and RHEL 10 mingw-binutils. Numerous listed RHEL Binutils packages are marked unaffected. Exposure is greatest in developer, CI, analysis, or build environments that process untrusted object files.

Exploitation context

The supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in KEV. Exploitation requires an affected tool to process an attacker-controlled XCOFF file, so untrusted source artifacts, build inputs, attachments, and analysis samples are the principal concern.

Researcher notes

Affectedness is package-specific and should not be generalized to every Binutils installation. The bundle confirms the XCOFF parsing condition and heap overflow but provides no exploitability details beyond possible code execution or denial of service. Use Red Hat’s VEX and advisories as the authoritative basis for package status.

Mitigation direction

  • Review RHSA-2026:33527 and RHSA-2026:39022 for applicable vendor updates.
  • Apply Red Hat-provided updates to confirmed affected packages and images.
  • Restrict affected tooling from processing untrusted XCOFF object files until updated.
  • Isolate build and analysis workloads that must handle externally supplied object files.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Binutils, GDB, MinGW Binutils, and Hardened Images across development and CI environments.
  • Compare installed packages and image releases against Red Hat’s CVE and VEX status.
  • Confirm applicable RHSA updates are installed using approved asset-management evidence.
  • Identify workflows accepting object files from external or otherwise untrusted sources.
  • Retest affected build and analysis workflows after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-6846 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9redhat
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-6846Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  4. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  5. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  6. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  7. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPbinutils: Binutils: Arbitrary code execution via malformed XCOFF object file processing
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorbinutilsbinutils, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesbinutils-main, 2.45.1-5.1.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesbinutils-main, 2.46.1-1.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gcc-toolset-15-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-14-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-14-gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-15-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-15-gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gcc-toolset-14-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gcc-toolset-15-binutilsunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gdbunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8unaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.