LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-6845: Binutils: binutils: denial of service via crafted elf file

A flaw was found in binutils, specifically within the `readelf` utility. This vulnerability allows a local attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by tricking a user into processing a specially crafted Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) file. The exploitation of this flaw can lead to the system becoming unresponsive due to excessive resource consumption or a program crash.

MediumCVSS 5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-6845 is a denial-of-service flaw in GNU binutils readelf. A user or automated process must process a specially crafted ELF file. Successful exploitation can crash the tool or consume excessive resources, affecting availability rather than data confidentiality or integrity.

Executive priority

Treat this as routine but timely remediation. It is not a remote code execution issue, but it can disrupt developer, CI, or analysis services that handle untrusted binaries.

Technical view

Red Hat describes a CWE-476 flaw in readelf within binutils. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, score 5.0. Red Hat lists affected binutils, related gcc-toolset binutils, gdb, mingw-binutils, and Hardened Images packages across RHEL 6 through 10.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Red Hat systems that inspect, debug, scan, or build untrusted ELF binaries, especially CI, malware-analysis, build, support, and developer workstations. Pure servers that never process attacker-supplied binaries have lower practical exposure.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation and KEV is false. Abuse requires local privileges and user interaction or an automated workflow that feeds a crafted ELF file into affected tooling. Impact is availability only per the supplied CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Key gaps remain in the supplied bundle: no exploit proof, no KEV listing, no detailed patch version matrix, and no upstream root-cause detail beyond readelf and CWE-476. Avoid assuming broader product impact outside Red Hat’s listed packages.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Red Hat CVE page and linked RHSAs for package-specific fixes.
  • Update affected Red Hat packages when vendor advisories provide corrected builds.
  • Limit automated readelf/binutils processing of untrusted ELF files until patched.
  • Run binary analysis workloads with resource limits and low privileges.
  • Prioritize exposed CI, malware-analysis, and upload-processing environments first.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Red Hat systems for affected binutils, gdb, and toolset packages.
  • Map systems against the affected RHEL and Hardened Images entries.
  • Identify workflows that process external or user-submitted ELF files.
  • Confirm remediation status against RHSA-2026:34924 and RHSA-2026:39022.
  • Monitor Red Hat Bugzilla 2460012 for clarification or status changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-476: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-6845 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.33.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-6845Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesbinutils-main, 2.45.1-5.2.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesbinutils-main, 2.46.1-1.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gcc-toolset-15-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-14-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-14-gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-15-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gcc-toolset-15-gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gcc-toolset-14-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gcc-toolset-15-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gdbaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9mingw-binutilsaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-476 · source CWE mapping

NULL Pointer Dereference

NULL Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.