Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Emlog Pro through 2.6.23 does not verify certificates when connecting to configured AI providers. An attacker able to intercept that network traffic could steal provider API keys and return fraudulent AI responses, potentially influencing database queries or configuration changes.
Executive priority
Treat as an urgent credential and integrity risk where Emlog AI features are enabled. Prioritize affected systems whose outbound traffic crosses shared, untrusted, or intercepting networks. Contain exposure, follow vendor remediation guidance, rotate potentially exposed API keys, and review consequential AI-driven actions.
Technical view
In include/service/ai.php, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER and CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST are disabled unconditionally in sendStream(), sendImageRequest(), send(), and fetchSearchHtml(). This permits arbitrary certificates during intercepted HTTPS connections, exposing bearer tokens and response integrity. Crafted responses may reach tool handlers including query_database and update_config.
Likely exposure
Exposure applies to Emlog Pro through 2.6.23 when affected AI functions communicate with configured LLM providers. Exploitation requires an attacker positioned to intercept outbound HTTPS traffic. The supplied affected-product metadata is inconsistent, listing product “emlog” version “0,” so inventories should verify against the advisory.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources describe network interception with high complexity and no required privileges or user interaction. The supplied record is not marked as KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Successful exploitation could disclose AI-provider credentials and compromise the integrity of AI-driven actions.
Researcher notes
CWE-295 is supported by the unconditional disabling of both certificate-chain and hostname validation. CVSS 4.0 is 9.1. Impact depends on interception capability, configured credentials, and reachable tool handlers. The bundle does not identify a fixed version, official workaround, proof of exploitation, or confirmed real-world attacks.
Mitigation direction
- Review the vendor advisory and apply any fixed release or official mitigation it identifies.
- Until remediated, disable affected AI integrations where operationally acceptable.
- Restrict outbound AI-provider traffic to trusted network paths and monitored egress controls.
- After containment, rotate exposed LLM-provider API keys and revoke previous credentials.
Validation and detection
- Identify Emlog Pro deployments through 2.6.23 and determine whether AI integrations are configured.
- Confirm peer and hostname verification are enabled for every affected HTTPS request path.
- Review egress or proxy records for unexpected certificates or interception of AI-provider traffic.
- Audit provider logs for anomalous use of application bearer tokens.
- Review application records for unexpected database queries or configuration changes.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-67598 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 9.1 (4.0)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
2 official scoresWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheckCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.25.2VulnCheckVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 4.0 score
9.1CriticalVector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.4HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-hf85-99vj-m4c5)CVE reference, VulnCheck · vendor-advisory
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/emlog-pro-tls-certificate-validation-disabled-in-ai-phpCVE reference, VulnCheck · third-party-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Certificate Validation
Improper Certificate Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.