LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-66672: WordPress Flatastic theme <= 2.0 - PHP Object Injection vulnerability

Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Flatastic <= 2.0 versions.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Flatastic for WordPress is reported vulnerable to an unauthenticated PHP object injection flaw in versions through 2.0. A remote attacker may target an exposed site without credentials or user interaction. The supplied CVSS assessment indicates potentially severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but the sources do not describe confirmed outcomes for a specific site.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed internet-facing installations at version 2.0 or earlier as an immediate remediation priority. First establish whether Flatastic exists anywhere in production, including inactive theme copies. Escalate to incident response if suspicious activity or integrity changes appear. Active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence.

Technical view

CVE-2026-66672 is classified as CWE-502: deserialization of untrusted data. The reported attack is network-accessible, low-complexity, unauthenticated, and requires no user interaction. Successful impact may depend on usable PHP classes or gadget chains in the installation; the supplied sources do not document the vulnerable input, prerequisites, proof of concept, or confirmed code execution.

Likely exposure

Internet-facing WordPress installations using Flatastic version 2.0 or earlier are the likely exposure group. The bundle’s description and title specify versions through 2.0, but its structured affected record lists versions as unavailable and defaults to unaffected. Confirm the installed theme and version directly rather than relying solely on automated CPE matching.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks this CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation, public exploit code, or observed attacks. Its 9.8 CVSS score reflects technical potential, not confirmed exploitation. Exposure should still be assessed promptly because the reported flaw is remotely reachable without authentication.

Researcher notes

The record is sparse and internally inconsistent: narrative fields identify Flatastic through 2.0, while structured affected data says version unavailable and defaults to unaffected. No vulnerable parameter, patch version, gadget chain, proof of concept, or exploitation telemetry is provided. Avoid asserting remote code execution or compromise without additional evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Patchstack and the theme vendor for current remediation guidance and a fixed release.
  • Update to a vendor-confirmed safe version when one is identified.
  • Disable or remove Flatastic if exposure cannot be promptly resolved.
  • Restrict public access to affected sites if the theme must remain temporarily.
  • Preserve backups and relevant logs before remediation or incident investigation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for installed, active, or retained copies of Flatastic.
  • Record the Flatastic version and flag installations at version 2.0 or earlier.
  • Confirm remediation status against current vendor or Patchstack guidance.
  • Review web and security logs for suspicious unauthenticated activity around affected sites.
  • Perform integrity and account reviews if compromise indicators are discovered.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-502: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-66672 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-66672Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MonkeysanFlatasticn/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-502 · source CWE mapping

Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Deserialization of Untrusted Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.