CVE-2026-64077: netfilter: ebtables: move to two-stage removal scheme
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ebtables: move to two-stage removal scheme
Like previous patches for x_tables, follow same pattern in ebtables.
We can't reuse xt helpers: ebt_table struct layout is incompatible.
table->ops assignment is now done while still holding the ebt mutex
to make sure we never expose partially-filled table struct.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-64077 is a Linux kernel ebtables/netfilter flaw with high severity. The issue is local, meaning an attacker generally needs some access to the system first, but successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The public bundle does not show active exploitation or a named distro patch level.
Executive priority
Patch on the next urgent kernel maintenance cycle, faster for shared or multi-tenant Linux systems. The business risk is not broad remote compromise from the supplied evidence, but local compromise of a vulnerable host could still be severe.
Technical view
The fix changes ebtables removal handling to a two-stage scheme and moves table->ops assignment under the ebt mutex. The stated goal is to avoid exposing a partially filled ebt_table structure. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8 with local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and high CIA impact.
Likely exposure
Linux systems running affected kernel builds with ebtables/netfilter support are the relevant exposure. Risk is higher on multi-user servers, shared hosting, CI runners, and container hosts where untrusted or low-privileged local code may run. The bundle’s affected version details are incomplete and should be confirmed against vendor advisories.
Exploitation context
The provided sources support local, low-privilege exploitation potential by CVSS, but do not provide exploit details. KEV is false, and no cited source in the bundle reports active exploitation. Treat this as a serious local privilege-impact kernel issue, not as confirmed internet-wide remote exploitation.
Researcher notes
Public detail is limited to the kernel resolution text and stable commit references. The affected-version data in the bundle appears inconsistent, so avoid overclaiming exact ranges. Analysis should center on ebtables table lifecycle locking, partial structure exposure, and whether downstream kernels have backported the stable commits.
Mitigation direction
Apply a vendor kernel update that includes the referenced stable fixes.
Prioritize shared systems where untrusted local users or workloads run.
Restrict unnecessary local shell, build, and container access until patched.
Check Linux distribution advisories for exact fixed package versions.
Monitor CISA KEV and vendor advisories for exploitation status changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions across servers, images, and container hosts.
Check package changelogs for CVE-2026-64077 or the referenced commits.
Confirm whether ebtables/netfilter support is present or loaded.
Map systems with untrusted local users or workloads for priority.
Reboot after kernel updates and verify the active running kernel.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2026-64077 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.