LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-63304: AVideo through 29.0 OS Command Injection via listFFmpegProcesses

AVideo through 29.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in plugin/API/standAlone/functions.php where the listFFmpegProcesses() function interpolates unsanitized keyword parameters inside single quotes without escaping. Attackers who can craft a valid encrypted codeToExec payload can break out of the single-quoted grep context and execute arbitrary OS commands as the web-server user.

CriticalCVSS 9.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

AVideo through 29.0 has a critical server-side command injection issue. A successful attacker could run operating-system commands as the web-server user, which can lead to data access, service disruption, or deeper compromise. The provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a critical priority for any exposed AVideo environment. The business risk is remote command execution on the server, but current evidence does not confirm active exploitation or a named patch.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-78 in plugin/API/standAlone/functions.php. listFFmpegProcesses() places unsanitized keyword parameters inside a single-quoted grep context without escaping. Exploitation requires crafting a valid encrypted codeToExec payload, reflected by CVSS 4.0: AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running WWBN AVideo through 29.0, especially deployments where the affected plugin/API standalone path is reachable. The source bundle does not identify specific hosted services, distributions, or fixed versions.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Sources describe a path to arbitrary OS command execution, but with high complexity and a prerequisite valid encrypted payload. Treat internet-facing AVideo deployments as urgent until vendor guidance is confirmed.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the CVE description, GitHub advisory, and VulnCheck advisory. Key uncertainty is remediation status: the bundle names affected versions through 29.0 but does not provide a confirmed fixed release or mitigation beyond vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory all AVideo deployments and confirm exact installed versions.
  • Review the GitHub vendor advisory for fixed-version or configuration guidance.
  • Upgrade or apply vendor-provided fixes as soon as they are available.
  • Restrict external access to affected AVideo API paths where operationally possible.
  • Monitor web-server logs for unusual standalone API activity.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any deployment runs AVideo 29.0 or earlier.
  • Check whether plugin/API/standAlone/functions.php is present and reachable.
  • Review logs around codeToExec-related requests without replaying payloads.
  • Verify vendor advisory status before declaring remediation complete.
  • Document compensating controls if a vendor fix is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-63304 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.2 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.2CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.2Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-63304Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
WWBNAVideo0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.