LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-63294: Root RCE via image backup.yaml symlink

A link following vulnerability in LXD allows an attacker to achieve root command execution on the host system. During the import or unpacking of crafted image or backup archives, LXD fails to properly validate and confine the backup.yaml file when it exists as a symbolic link. An attacker can exploit this flaw by providing a malicious archive with a symlinked backup.yaml file, causing LXD to process unconfined configuration metadata and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

LXD can be tricked into following a symbolic link inside a crafted image or backup archive. When LXD imports or unpacks that archive, attacker-controlled configuration may escape expected confinement and run commands as root on the host. Successful exploitation could compromise the host and its workloads.

Executive priority

Treat exposed or multi-user LXD environments as an immediate remediation priority because successful exploitation grants root control of the host. Prioritize systems accepting remote archive imports, restrict that capability now, and schedule vendor-directed upgrades. Evidence of active exploitation is not established.

Technical view

CVE-2026-63294 is a CWE-59 link-following flaw involving backup.yaml during LXD archive import or unpacking. Insufficient symlink validation allows unconfined configuration metadata to be processed, enabling root command execution. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 9.9 with network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where listed LXD versions—4.0.0, 5.0.0, 5.21.0, or 6.0—accept image or backup archives from low-privileged or otherwise untrusted users. The bundle marks other versions unaffected by default, but administrators should confirm exact release boundaries with Canonical's advisory.

Exploitation context

The supplied record does not show CISA KEV listing or provide evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires a crafted archive containing a symlinked backup.yaml and access sufficient to submit or trigger its import. No exploit maturity or public proof-of-concept status is established by the bundle.

Researcher notes

The security boundary failure occurs when backup.yaml is represented by a symbolic link inside an imported archive. Processing the referenced metadata outside intended confinement can reach root command execution. The supplied data does not identify fixed versions, patch commits, exploitation telemetry, or proof-of-concept availability; consult the vendor advisory for those details.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Canonical's advisory for fixed releases and upgrade instructions.
  • Restrict image and backup import privileges to trusted administrators.
  • Avoid importing archives from untrusted or unverified sources.
  • Limit network access to LXD management interfaces until remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory LXD installations and record their exact versions.
  • Compare installed versions with Canonical's published affected and fixed release boundaries.
  • Review who can upload, import, or restore LXD archives.
  • Investigate recent archive imports and unexpected privileged host activity.
  • Confirm remediation using approved defensive tests in an isolated environment.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-59: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-63294 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16canonical

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-63294Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CanonicalLXDLXD, 4.0.0, 5.0.0, 5.21.0, 6.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-59 · source CWE mapping

Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')

Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.