LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-63039: Apache InLong: SQL Injection via Unvalidated MyBatis Dollar-Sign Interpolation in AuditAlertRuleService

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache InLong. This allows an attacker to inject the string value into the SQL statement, enabling SQL injection. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12080 .

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Apache InLong versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.x contain a critical SQL injection flaw. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could potentially manipulate the underlying database, risking sensitive data disclosure, unauthorized changes, or service disruption. The available sources do not confirm active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent remediation item for any affected deployment, especially network-reachable systems. Prioritize asset discovery, access restriction, and upgrade validation. Consider incident review if vulnerable services were exposed to untrusted networks.

Technical view

AuditAlertRuleService places an unvalidated string into an SQL statement through MyBatis dollar-sign interpolation. The CVSS 3.1 assessment is 9.8: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, with potentially high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure applies to Apache InLong 2.0.0 and later releases before 2.4.0. Risk is highest where a vulnerable deployment is network-reachable and the affected audit alert rule functionality is accessible. The provided sources do not identify the precise endpoint, parameter, or deployment prerequisites.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates remote, unauthenticated exploitation may be possible without user interaction. However, CVE-2026-63039 is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source confirms exploitation in the wild or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

The sources establish CWE-89, affected versions, CVSS characteristics, and remediation. They do not document the exact input path, endpoint, authentication behavior beyond the CVSS vector, exploit availability, or observed attacks. Avoid assuming compromise solely from version exposure; validate with service and database telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Apache InLong to version 2.4.0 or later.
  • Alternatively, cherry-pick Apache pull request 12080 following vendor guidance and compatibility testing.
  • Until remediated, restrict network access to vulnerable InLong deployments.
  • Monitor affected databases and InLong services for unexpected activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Apache InLong deployments and record their exact versions.
  • Confirm no instance runs version 2.0.0 through 2.3.x.
  • Verify version 2.4.0 or the referenced corrective change is deployed.
  • Test audit alert rule functionality after remediation.
  • Review application and database logs for unexplained queries, errors, or changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-63039 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-63039Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Apache Software FoundationApache InLong2.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.