CVE-2026-62867: Incus has an argument injection in storage volume block.create_options that leads to arbitrary command execution
Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.3.0, improper validation of user-provided `block.create_options` in storage volume configuration leads to argument injection in the constructed filesystem creation command line. This allows a project-scoped user to inject arbitrary arguments into the binary executed as root. Version 7.3.0 patches the issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Incus versions before 7.3.0 let a project-scoped user manipulate a storage setting so a root-run filesystem command receives attacker-controlled arguments. Successful abuse can result in arbitrary command execution with severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Executive priority
Treat as an immediate patching priority for multi-tenant or delegated Incus environments. Low-privileged project access can cross into root execution, creating potential full-host impact. Environments without such users remain affected by version but may have lower immediate exposure.
Technical view
Improper validation of storage volume block.create_options causes argument injection in a filesystem creation command executed as root. The issue is classified as CWE-88 and carries CVSS 3.1 score 9.9: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and changed scope.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Incus versions earlier than 7.3.0. Practical risk is highest where untrusted or compromised project-scoped users can supply block.create_options in storage volume configuration. The bundle does not identify affected deployment defaults or additional prerequisites.
Exploitation context
The provided sources support root-level arbitrary command execution by a project-scoped user. They do not establish anonymous exploitation or active exploitation in the wild. The CVE is not identified as being in KEV, and the bundle provides no public-exploit evidence.
Researcher notes
The trust-boundary failure occurs when user-controlled block.create_options is incorporated into a root-executed filesystem command without adequate validation. Scope changed in the CVSS vector reflects escalation beyond the project boundary. The supplied evidence does not detail affected filesystems, payload constraints, detection indicators, or exploit availability.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade affected Incus installations to version 7.3.0 or later.
Prioritize systems accessible to untrusted or externally managed project-scoped users.
Until upgraded, restrict untrusted project-scoped access where operationally feasible.
Check the vendor advisory for any additional supported mitigation guidance.
Validation and detection
Inventory Incus installations and identify versions earlier than 7.3.0.
Identify project-scoped users able to configure storage volumes.
Review storage volume configurations for unexpected block.create_options values.
Confirm upgraded systems report Incus 7.3.0 or later.
Review relevant administrative and system logs for suspicious storage-volume activity.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-88: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-88 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.