LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-62867: Incus has an argument injection in storage volume block.create_options that leads to arbitrary command execution

Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.3.0, improper validation of user-provided `block.create_options` in storage volume configuration leads to argument injection in the constructed filesystem creation command line. This allows a project-scoped user to inject arbitrary arguments into the binary executed as root. Version 7.3.0 patches the issue.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Incus versions before 7.3.0 let a project-scoped user manipulate a storage setting so a root-run filesystem command receives attacker-controlled arguments. Successful abuse can result in arbitrary command execution with severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate patching priority for multi-tenant or delegated Incus environments. Low-privileged project access can cross into root execution, creating potential full-host impact. Environments without such users remain affected by version but may have lower immediate exposure.

Technical view

Improper validation of storage volume block.create_options causes argument injection in a filesystem creation command executed as root. The issue is classified as CWE-88 and carries CVSS 3.1 score 9.9: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Incus versions earlier than 7.3.0. Practical risk is highest where untrusted or compromised project-scoped users can supply block.create_options in storage volume configuration. The bundle does not identify affected deployment defaults or additional prerequisites.

Exploitation context

The provided sources support root-level arbitrary command execution by a project-scoped user. They do not establish anonymous exploitation or active exploitation in the wild. The CVE is not identified as being in KEV, and the bundle provides no public-exploit evidence.

Researcher notes

The trust-boundary failure occurs when user-controlled block.create_options is incorporated into a root-executed filesystem command without adequate validation. Scope changed in the CVSS vector reflects escalation beyond the project boundary. The supplied evidence does not detail affected filesystems, payload constraints, detection indicators, or exploit availability.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Incus installations to version 7.3.0 or later.
  • Prioritize systems accessible to untrusted or externally managed project-scoped users.
  • Until upgraded, restrict untrusted project-scoped access where operationally feasible.
  • Check the vendor advisory for any additional supported mitigation guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Incus installations and identify versions earlier than 7.3.0.
  • Identify project-scoped users able to configure storage volumes.
  • Review storage volume configurations for unexpected block.create_options values.
  • Confirm upgraded systems report Incus 7.3.0 or later.
  • Review relevant administrative and system logs for suspicious storage-volume activity.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-88: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-62867 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-62867Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
lxcincus< 7.3.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-88 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.